IBJNews

Local business accused of selling illegal immigration services

IBJ Staff
March 9, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Attorney General’s Office filed a civil lawsuit Wednesday against an Indianapolis business for allegedly performing immigration services without proper licensing and training.

The complaint names The Mexican Civic Association of Indiana Inc. and M. Esther Barber, operating as Asociacion Civica Mexicana De Indiana Inc. at 2226 Shelby St.

Barber, who is not an attorney, is accused of knowingly violating the Deceptive Consumer Sales Act by providing advice without the required licensing and training, according to the suit.

The Attorney General’s Office alleges that Barber has advertised herself to the Spanish-speaking community as someone who can assist with immigration issues. Since 2006, she has allegedly prepared immigration forms for consumers for a fee, in violation of Indiana law. Two consumers lodged complaints against her after the paperwork did not comply with legal requirements.

The Attorney General’s Office is seeking an injunction against Barber to prevent her from advising consumers about immigration policies, preparing forms on their behalf or accepting payment for attorney services without a license to practice law.

Barber has been a public critic of immigration-reform efforts before the Indiana legislature.

The suit also seeks consumer restitution for unlawfully obtained funds, civil penalties of up to $5,000 for each violation and up to $500 for each intentional violation of the Deceptive Consumer Sales Act.

“It is important that foreign nationals who wish to follow the law and get their immigration paperwork in order not be deceived by fraudsters motivated by fees who are unqualified to give proper advice,” Attorney General Greg Zoeller said in a prepared statement.

Zoeller filed the suit in Marion Superior Court. He also filed a similar complaint against a Fort Wayne business, United Hispanic Caring Hearts, in Allen Circuit Court.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • just the beginning
    This is just the tip of the iceberg. This practice (illegal immigration services) is getting more prevalent with the growing illegal population in Indy.
  • Protected Class
    Is it no wonder that lawyers need lawyers to protect their extortion (income). Was this person practicing law or just filling out paperwork? If what she did was done by the individual themselves, would they have been arrested too? Doubt it. Sounds like some lawyers is trying to make sure they cash in on the non-citizens as much as employers do.
  • Conclusions
    Jump to conclusions much? No where in this article does it say she is assisting "illegal" immigrants. As someone who used to work in immigration law, there are plenty of reasons why those here legally could need assistance with immigration policies.
  • Deserving
    Hasn't it always been the case that those who beat their chests the most saying they are standing up for the oppressed minorities (in this case ILLEGAL aliens) are generally among those exploiting their situations?

    Barber has done our community no favors with her support of ILLEGAlS.

    I wish the AG well in his prosecution!
  • really?
    Lizzy - tolerance? For people who broke the law? You must be a liberal, because tolerance should only be for law breakers.

    Really now? Tolerance? Yeesh. You may as well have tolerance for the bank robber, since they are obviously doing this to get back at the evil majority?
  • Of course they are.
    Indiana in general is a very bigoted state. Read the boards about 80% go after every minority group there is. Indiana politics are also very bigoted. I am ashamed of this this state. Why do we not teach more tolerance?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT