IBJNews

Local CBS affiliate moving from WISH to WTTV

 IBJ Staff
August 11, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WISH-TV Channel 8 is losing its affiliation with CBS-TV after nearly six decades, CBS Corp. announced Monday morning.

The CBS affiliate in the Indianapolis area will move from LIN Media's WISH and begin broadcasting on Tribune Broadcasting’s WTTV-TV Channel 4 on Jan. 1, 2015, the company said.

WISH has been the local affiliate for CBS since 1956.

With the CBS affiliation, WTTV will become the new home of the NFL's Indianapolis Colts.

An update to this story may be found here.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Fox 8?
    I hope there could and might be a chance of WISH-TV affiliating with Fox... even if WISH has to go independent until 2016, when WXIN-TV's Fox affiliation agreement is due to expire. Hopefully Media General/LIN are successful in WISH hitching up with Fox, amid WISH's 58-year union with CBS coming to an end.
  • I can't think of any market that has 3 full power stations with 3 top 7 networks
    Around mid 90's they couldn't have 2 full power commercial stations in a market. Back then they had to sign a waiver for WTTK. Details on that in link below. WTTV may overlap with WLKY. It wouldn't surprise me if 1 of Indy locals don't claim unfair competition was to weaken 8 so there is a weak newscast at 10PM or no newscast to compete with WXIN. Not sure if WLKY could file a complaint on to much possible overlap signal between WTTV being a CBS station? I thought WISH had a good signal but some say it was not good enough. They could probable move WNDY DT to Indy to replace WISH signal, WISH signal would replace WNDY and move 17 translator between Marion and Muncie for WNDY. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WIPX-TV
  • Unwatchable
    News reporters often look like they are trying to win an Oscar rather than reporting the news. Whoever told them to tell a story with emotion instead of offering straight news should never work in the industry again. As for news, WISH was all about if it bleeds and fluff stories, ignoring stories of importance to Indy.
  • h8ers
    hope scot sander and the other news barbies land somewhere in indy. i do hope this is an opportunity for wolfsie to never pick up the mic again.
  • monopoly??
    How can the FCC allow Tribune to hold the franchise rights to 3 different networks for one market?
    • CBS Move
      Honestly, I don't care WHERE CBS lands, as long as my local Comcast provider STILL offers a CW channel! There's no proof ALL local providers will offer CW on its new channel! CW is about the only non-cable network I even watch regularly.
    • Nice solution to rising cable bills
      Assuming LIN can provide some decent programming throughout the day, this could end up being a brilliant business decision. Lots of people still watch over the air tv.
    • Sorry to lose WISH
      Wow, lots of news anchors, reports to probably lose their jobs, Maybe WISH can carry some of the new sub channels...Retro TV, Grit TV, Movies!, etc. MeTV is a great subchannel carried by WTHR.
    • Hm?
      Would love to know some specifics as to what Lizzy refers. Sounds like axe-grinding...?
    • Southern Indiana battleground
      This will drive the CBS affiliate (WLKY) in Louisville absolutely bonkers. WTTV's reach into southern Indiana is strong - and it will be VERY interesting to see how they respond to an Indianapolis based network station treading so deeply into their territory. This is a big win for Tribune.
    • Probably not
      It looks like the CW is moving to 4.2 according to the article in Variety. Time will tell I suppose, but it'll be interesting to see what becomes of WISH.
    • poor performance
      This is not surprising. 8 has consistently made bad decisions on what and who they cover. Ethical issues about their approach have been in question for years. Their investigative and negative high drama approach has resulted in fewer viewers and much less trust. karma?
      • 60 Mins
        Brilliant, Jose!
      • Babs
        Good for you, Babs. How times have changed. In the old (NTSC, pre Digital TV days), it was channel 4 that has issues reading the North suburbs. Now, the FCC assigned a high VHF broadcast channel for WISH. Sucked for them!
      • Tonite on 60 Minutes
        "I'm Morely Safer." "I'm Mike Wallace." "I'm Ed Bradley." "I'm Sammy Terry. All this and George the Spider: tonight on 60 Minutes."
        • Channel 4?
          When I was a kid we had to adjust the rabbit ears to get channel 4 so we could watch Sammy Terry' Nightmare Theater. Now it's going to be CBS?
        • WISH
          Will they get the CW network or just shut down?
          • WHAAA???
            Will Stan Wood still be there?
          • Good
            Now I'll be able to actually get CBS in my home without ridiculous antenna gymnastics that only sometimes work. Seriously, boost your signal, WISH.

            Post a comment to this story

            COMMENTS POLICY
            We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
             
            You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
             
            Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
             
            No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
             
            We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
             

            Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

            Sponsored by
            ADVERTISEMENT

            facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

            Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
            Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
             
            Subscribe to IBJ
            1. Aaron is my fav!

            2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

            3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

            4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

            5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

            ADVERTISEMENT