IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Rickey's sculptures, Phoenix's 'Zoomerville' advance Indy's art reputation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

This week, art in the wind and an original musical.

Seeing still images of George Rickey's stainless steel work, shining like flamboyant cousins of the "2001: A Space Odyssey" monolith, you might easily write them off as cold. Maybe even redundant and uninteresting.

It's a given that photos don't do justice to most outstanding works of art. Rickey's sculptures, when reduced to a single, captured image, are diminished even more than most. His large-scale work thrives on contact. It's shifting pieces, coerced by the wind into unexpected patterns struggling toward harmony, yield more with every view, with every extra minute spent with them, with every small gust of air.

"George Rickey: An Evolution," the latest major Public Art Indianapolis exhibition, represents a number of firsts. It's the first of the series to feature a widely accepted master of his form (Rickey's work is in museums around the world, including the Getty, the Guggenheim, Tokyo's Hara, the National Gallery of Art, and the Tate Gallery). It's the first to celebrate the work of a deceased artist. And it's also the first to feature an artist with a strong Indiana connection. Rickey was born in South Bend and taught at Indiana University.

Ten of Rickey's pieces have been placed downtown, and my few quibbles have to do with presentation rather than content. While the most accomplished and evocative of the work, 1989's "Breaking Column II," is given room to breathe, other pieces seem to have been forced uncomfortably into the downtown landscape, with trees and other obstacles obscuring the experience rather than enhancing it. "Two Planes Vertical Horizontal IV" is a notable victim, hidden as it is behind the arch at City Market. So is "Four L's Excentric II," which seems to have had meaning forced on it by placing it in front of Christ Church Cathedral. Yes, if the wind's whims dictate it, the pieces could come together to form a cross, but it seems simplistic. (Although, I'm told, the piece was Rickey's response to the Pope's visit to Scotland, so read into the fragmentation what you will).

Because the work isn't seen in sequence, it's difficult to see the "evolution" that the show's title is driving us toward. And ideally, the related show, the Indianapolis Art Center's "A Life in Art: Works by George Rickey," would have opened simultaneously with the unveiling of the downtown work. As it stands, we have to wait until the end of June for that tie-in.

Still, it's an outstanding show. I love having the Edward Scissorhands-like "Six Lines in a T II" just outside my office window. A drive-by made "Two Planes Vertical Horizontal IV" seem like glorified solar panels, but seeing them up close—being under and around them—sent my mind reeling to thoughts of balance and perspective.

The more time spent with the works—whether all at once or throughout the summer (the show closes Sept. 7)—should only enhance the experience. I'll be checking in with them alone, with my kids, and with visitors over the next few months.

"The Zippers of Zoomerville or Two-Hundred Laps and a Lass" starts with laughs. It ends with laughs. And it's packed with punch lines in between, many of them set to music. It's shameless in its willingness to do almost anything for a laugh—I say "almost" because, while you are unlikely to hear as many scrotal jokes anywhere else, the show feels remarkably innocent. It isn't out to offend. Just to put a crazy smile on your face. Which it does.

Using the Indy 500 and its surrounding culture as a launch pad, "Zoomerville" wisely never gets too precious or insidery. It hits the wall occasionally and, like the race itself, there are some uninspiring stretches. And it doesn't really have much to say about the race or anything else. But those barely put a dent in my admiration, enthusiasm and, OK, maybe even awe about what's being pulled off at the Phoenix Theatre.

Comedies don't win Oscars. They rarely win Tonys. They don't get a whole lot of respect in part because, like tear-jerkers, they appeal to the primal. At the same time, though, they play an intellectual game. Good comedies have smarts. And being so dependent on audience reaction, they are really easy to screw up.

"Zoomerville" doesn't. And considering that it's a true, home-grown original, its achievement is even more remarkable.

Inspired by Gilbert & Sullivan, "Zoomerville" is imprinted with influences from Steven Sondheim to Andy Prieboy (whose club musical, "White Trash Wins Lotto," is the closest thing I've seen to it in style and spirit). But I don't want to give too much credit to its antecedents at the expense of praise for the relentless creativity of playwright/ co-lyricist Jack O'Hara, aided and abetted by composer Tim Brickley (who plays piano on stage throughout). The densely (and hilariously) packed lyrics and jaunty score are both stronger than any reasonable theatergoer would expect. And Phebe Taylor and Scot Greenwell stand out in the plum parts of pageant queen Happenstance Throttlehopper and rookie racer John Hoosier Lordyboy Jr.

"Zoomerville" offers two hours of joyful silliness—OK, maybe an hour and a half, with some easily trimmable filler—that, I believe, could break out of this market and reach a wider audience. Do I smell a future "Urinetown"?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT