IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Making history at arts venues

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

It was only 43 years ago.

That difficult-to-shake thought stayed with me as I stood and watched Robert Kennedy on the back of a pickup truck informing an Indianapolis crowd that a gunman had shot and killed Martin Luther King Jr.

His words: forthright, humane, heartfelt and largely unscripted. His demeanor: searching, introspective, deeply sad and profoundly human.

Less than half a century ago, right-thinking people had to fight for bus seats and water fountains and lunch counters, blatantly bigoted speech could come from public officials, and a brave man who lost his brother to an assassin’s bullet delivered truly tragic news on a volatile day.
 

ae-kennedy-15col High-tech innovations put Robert F. Kennedy and entourage on the back of a real pickup in the Indiana History Center’s latest “You Are There” exhibit. (Photo Courtesy Indiana Historical Society)

No, I wasn’t actually at 17th and Broadway in Indianapolis on April 4, 1968. I was busy being a 4-year-old in New Jersey. But thanks to the Indiana Historical Society, I feel as if I experienced that scene. Its latest “You Are There” addition, “1968: Robert F. Kennedy Speaks,” effectively puts visitors in the crowd as a holographic Kennedy delivers that remarkable speech on that terrible day. Afterward, costumed cast members playing characters who have been listening to the speech engage patrons in conversation about the news. (The trio I experienced the show with had solid answers to my questions, although one’s use of the term “African-American” seemed anachronistic for the period.)

Context mostly comes later. In a post-show room, videos offer first-person insight from people who were there and interactive screens that make use of the photo collection of the Indiana Historical Society. It’s here, too, that you can see what happened to the person you “played.” (Each visitor is given a character sheet at the onset—I was an AP photographer.)

This “You Are There” packs a lot into a small area, but there’s more to the story. If you find your interest sparked, pick up a copy of Ray Boomhower’s book “Robert F. Kennedy and the 1968 Democratic Primary” (Indiana University Press) or give a listen to the L.A. Theatre Works recording of the drama “RFK: The Journey to Justice.”

The former, an Indiana Book Award winner, goes deep into the details of a tricky campaign. The latter, commissioned in part by the University of Notre Dame’s DeBartolo Performing Arts Center, offers a fascinating look at the sometimes antagonistic relationship between the Kennedy administration and King and how Robert Kennedy’s politics evolved to the point where he became the person capable of making one of the most important speeches in Indiana history.

Details on the exhibition can be found at www.indianahistory.org.
__________

Just across the street from the Indiana History Center, the Eiteljorg Museum of American Indians and Western Art looks at another interesting pairing in U.S. history. Its new show “Red/Black” (through Aug. 7) explores the interactions between African-Americans and Native Americans.


ae-redblack-15col Radmilla Cody, the controversial, biracial Miss Navajo Nation, will be speaking at the Eiteljorg Museum. (Photo Courtesy Eiteljorg Museum)

Perhaps one of the reasons the subject has taken so long to receive a major museum exhibition is because its issues aren’t, well, black and white. What to make of the fact that Native Americans fought for the South during the Civil War? Or that some Native Americans owned black slaves? That the Buffalo Soldiers fought Native Americans or that, more recently, controversy erupted when biracial Radmilla Cody became Miss Navajo Nation?

The Eiteljorg wisely embraces, rather than shies away from, the complexity, offering an object-and-text-panel show that is more likely to engage those who give time to it. Special events are scheduled throughout the run. More information at www.eiteljorg.com.
____________

I’m playing catch-up with the plays in this year’s Going Solo festival of one-actor shows at the Indiana Repertory Theatre (through March 13). So far, I’ve only gotten to “Fire in the Garden,” in which playwright and Indiana University teacher Ken Weitzman tells the semi-autobiographical story of a new father trying to come to terms with the self-immolation of Norman Morrison, who set himself on fire outside the Pentagon in 1965—with his 1-year-old daughter nearby.

As told here, dad antics (new-agey birthing classes, etc.) come across as trite and forced compared to the true-life drama of Morrison’s choices. Despite the efforts of actor Ryan Artzberger, the intermissionless play—which, in an earlier version, was performed at the John Waldron Arts Center in Bloomington in 2009—still lacks a solid main character. Whenever focus turned to him instead of Morrison, I felt like saying, “Down in front.”•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com. Twitter: IBJArts and follow Lou Harry’s A&E blog at www.ibj.com/arts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT