IBJOpinion

MARCUS: Hoosier employment deficit stands

Morton Marcus
February 12, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

Last week’s column brought three spirits to my desk. First was the Spirit of Humanity, upset because I described the recession and recovery using numbers instead of people and concepts.

Next came the Spirit of Pertinence, indignant because my measure was compensation rather than jobs. Finally, the Spirit of Place fired a shot at my state-by-state analysis, which ignored the diversity among Indiana’s metropolitan areas.

To me, defective as I am, numbers offer specificity about people and concepts without the sentimentality of anecdote. To me, money is the issue. Few people labor for the glory of being employed; most people work for money. When they do not work, they have less to spend and less joy enters the homes of merchants. Thus, the first two spirits were told where they could go, and they left.

The third spirit hit its target, and this column is devoted to Indiana’s 16 metropolitan areas. I have no data, however, on compensation and will discuss instead the number of people employed.

Hoosiers with jobs at the end of 2010 totaled 260,000 fewer than four years earlier—the level necessary to regain the high ground we occupied before the recession. Those 260,000 equal an 8-percent work deficit. Bloomington’s metro area has a deficit of just 4 percent, while Elkhart struggles under a 23-percent deficit.

As the number of job-holders declined statewide, the number of people unemployed increased 136,000 (92-percent higher than at the end of 2006). In Evansville’s metro area, the number of unemployed grew a relatively modest 69 percent, compared with the 123-percent increase in Columbus.

How could 260,000 people lose employment and only 136,000 become unemployed? The answer: 124,000 Hoosiers left the labor force. Returning to pre-recession conditions demands not only reducing the number of unemployed, it means reattracting those who have moved on to other activities (retirement, living out-of state, returning to school or just sitting on the sidelines).

In Elkhart’s metro area, nearly three-quarters of those no longer employed left the labor force. In South Bend and Kokomo, the figure stands at 65 percent. Why are these numbers so high? It is not because of unemployment insurance. If you are not in the labor force, you cannot get unemployment compensation.

By contrast, in Lafayette and Indianapolis-Carmel, just a third of the job losers left the labor force, while in the Terre Haute and Jeffersonville-New Albany areas, the figure was 42 percent.

High rates of abandoning the labor force could be evidence of workers anticipating few job opportunities soon. Lower rates of labor-force departures (just 9 percent in Bloomington) may indicate more optimism about employment opportunities.

Leaving the labor force because of low expectations is called a discouraged-worker effect. It could be a knowledge effect, because the worker has rational expectations of the job market and knows when to sit out and wait. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics counts people as discouraged if they are capable and willing to work, but have not looked for work during the last four weeks.

To see what this behavior means in terms of the unemployment rate, add the number of unemployed in 2010 to the labor force leavers (2006 to 2010) and divide by the 2006 labor force. Thus, we get a new Indiana unemployment rate of 12.6 percent, compared with the official 9.1 percent for December 2010. In the Elkhart metro area, this new unemployment rate skyrockets to 26.7 percent from 12.8 percent. Evansville climbs from a moderate 7.8 percent to 11.1 percent. Fort Wayne rises from 9.3 percent to 14.4 percent and the Gary area from 9.5 percent to 13.3 percent.

If numbers like these were being passed around, perhaps the unemployment situation would be taken more seriously by the business and community leaders who seem satisfied with our steady, but relaxed economic progress.•

__________

Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT