MARCUS: Indiana jobs situation is improving

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

“Is it true that Indiana’s economy has turned around?” Strudel Morceaux, a junior journalist asked.

“I cannot answer that question.” I said.

“What?” Strudel ex-claimed. “You’re the economist and you don’t know what’s hap-pening with Indiana’s economy?”

“What,” I asked, “is Indiana’s economy?”

“Now you’re playing mind games,” Strudel objected.

“Indiana’s economy is measured in different ways and judged in still other ways,” I elaborated. “For many people, an economy is doing well if it is adding jobs. For others, an economy’s performance is judged by its unemployment rate. Those are only two of many measures.”

“Enough,” Strudel said, beginning to flake.

“Indiana’s latest unemployment rate was 10 percent for the second consecutive month,” I offered. “That’s not satisfactory, but better than the 10.6 percent of a year ago. The decline in the number of people employed that lasted nearly two years seems over. From February 2008 through last December, Indiana had a decline of 284,500 workers holding jobs.

“Then, in the first five months of this year, Indiana enjoyed an increase of 23,100 people employed. This represents just an 8-percent recovery—not quite enough to set off firecrackers.”

“So,” Strudel said confidently, “we’ve hit bottom and the turnaround is in progress.”

“There is reason to say that,” I said. “When we look at jobs, rather than employed people, … .”

“Hold it!” Strudel cried. “Every job is filled by a person.”

“Yes,” I agreed, “but many people hold more than one job. Jobs are not equal to the number of people working. Plus, some Hoosiers work outside Indiana and some Indiana jobs are held by people living beyond the Hoosier frontiers.”

“Piffle,” Strudel said, dismissing the distinction.

“Possibly piffle,” I conceded. “Yet it explains why the number of jobs and number of employed people are different. Nonetheless, let me continue.

“Every month from March 2008 to April of this year, the number of jobs in Indiana was less than in the same month a year earlier. You might say we hit bottom in June 2009, when the number of jobs fell to 201,400 fewer than in June 2008. Since then, that difference has been shrinking. Now, in May, for the first time in 27 months, the number of Hoosier jobs exceeded the level of a year earlier.

“The truly good news is that, for nearly two years, stretching back to the spring of 2008, the number of jobs in Indiana fell by 229,400. Since the start of this year, we’ve added 53,200 jobs, a recovery of nearly a quarter of our lost jobs.”

“Then you’ll agree that we’re on the road back,” Strudel said triumphantly.

“No,” I said. “I want to know that average wages are rising for Hoosiers. I want evidence that government revenue is increasing and that more money is being spent on the necessities of life—things like education, transportation, communications and public health. It won’t do us any good to meet the usual demand for Halloween costumes if we’re not investing in our future.”

“You just won’t accept the good news, will you?” Strudel said angrily.

“Right,” I said. “We have a long-term deficit of responsible spending in this state. The restoration of things as they were will not lead to a productive, competitive economy tomorrow. Patting ourselves on the back because we moved part-way back from a business-cycle low is deceptive and cynical; it might be acceptable from a political candidate, but not appropriate from you as a serious observer of our state’s economy.”

“I’m sorry I asked,” Strudel said. “I was just looking for a quick quote.”•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.