MORRIS: Fair is fair ... or is it?

Greg Morris
April 21, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

MorrisMany of us celebrated tax day last week by reconciling our contributions from the past year to federal, state and local governments. I’m always hopeful that I paid my fair share, but if not, I’m willing to get some more money out to the various government entities right away. After all, I know they are short of money because it’s what I hear about in the news every day.

The important thing is, I always want to make sure I paid my fair share. I can’t stress this point enough. I don’t want to be a slacker. My parents taught me about fairness. How can you argue that fairness is not a good thing?

So, I went through my tax returns line by line. I wanted to make sure I hadn’t cheated anybody by underreporting income, yet I also wanted to ensure I took all my allowed deductions. That’s only fair. Right?

On the deduction side, there weren’t many, but that must be fair, so I’m good with that. On the tax side, wait a minute, there’s that pesky alternative minimum tax again. You know the one. It simply points out that you made too much money and the government is going to take more money from you (because that’s only fair). OK, I guess I can’t complain if it’s fair.

As it turned out, I planned pretty well with monies taken out of payroll each week. I instructed my employer to take out a lot, double it, then take out some more. The result was that I had a small refund coming back from the federal government and I owed the state a small amount. It’s always a relief to know you don’t have to pay a lot more in April and to know that obligation is fulfilled.

Just for fun, I always review how much tax was paid. When I look at the total tax due lines for federal and state returns, it can be sobering. That’s a lot of money! But I want to be fair. That’s what is most important. Then I start wondering if there were any other taxes I paid over the course of the year.

Well, yes, right there on my pay stub, it shows how much Social Security tax was taken out. There’s also Medicare tax withheld out of my paycheck. Wow, just those two items add up to a significant amount. And that doesn’t take into account that I’m paying only half of these taxes. My employer is paying the other half, along with all the other taxes a business must pay.

In addition to federal, state and local income taxes, Social Security and Medicare taxes, property taxes and state sales taxes, I remember paying federal and/or state taxes on my cable, telephone, gas, electric, and water and sewer utility bills, federal and state gasoline taxes, alcohol taxes, hotel taxes, airline taxes, taxes on license plates, toll road charges, waste management taxes, sports stadium taxes, and … I need to stop. I’m getting a migraine headache.

And since we love our taxes, my understanding is that, when the tax for health care reform is added to the expiration of the Bush tax cuts in 2013, top tax rates on ordinary income will increase almost 25 percent, capital gains top rates will increase almost 60 percent, and top rates on dividends will rise almost 300 percent. Congress doesn’t need to do anything for these tax rates to take effect in 2013. They will happen by default.

I want to be fair, but as John Stossel says, “Give me a break!” Stop the madness. We need to quit spending money like we don’t have a brain. Right now, with all the individual and corporate taxes paid, we should have more than enough revenue to cover the legitimate functions of government and to make sure basic human needs are met for everyone in this country who genuinely can't fend for themselves. Nobody has to be hungry or homeless.

Don’t mistake my earlier sarcastic tone for lack of compassion. I have plenty of compassion for folks who need help. I have no compassion for people who stay on the dole for years and work the system. And I’ve stated before that I’ll willingly give more money to help the government pull out of the current tailspin, if I trusted anyone in power to use it wisely. I have no such trust for Republicans or Democrats. This is not a partisan topic.

I do want to be fair. I do want to contribute my fair share. When will I see some fairness from our government leaders?•


Morris is publisher of IBJ. His column appears every other week. To comment on this column, send e-mail to gmorris@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.