IBJNews

New laws affect commercial property owners

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Three bills with implications for owners of commercial real estate were approved by the General Assembly and have been signed by Gov. Mitch Daniels.

One of the bills, House Bill 1005, loosens requirements for taking advantage of the state’s industrial recovery tax credit when renovating vacant industrial buildings. Few property owners have taken advantage of the credits, which are awarded by the Indiana Economic Development Corp.

The law signed by the governor reduces the minimum age of buildings eligible for the credit, from 20 years to 15. It also opens the credit up to smaller buildings. The previous minimum size of 250,000 square feet was reduced to 50,000 square feet through the end of 2014. The minimum rises to 100,000 after that date. To be considered vacant, a property can be no more than 25 percent occupied, but now a building need only be vacant at least a year to qualify for the credit. The previous requirement was two years.

Another new law discourages municipalities from charging apartment-building owners exorbitant inspection and registration fees. Some cities had started imposing the fees as a way to recoup revenue they’ve lost because of property tax caps. The law prohibits cities and towns from funneling such fee revenue to general operating budgets.

Finally, apartment owners were successful in shepherding through changes to controversial immigration legislation. The bill passed and signed by the governor no longer requires landlords to verify the legal status of tenants. According to the bill’s original language, landlords whose tenants were found to be in the country illegally could have been charged with a misdemeanor or Class D felony. That part of the bill was removed because it ran counter to the federal Fair Housing Act.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT