IBJNews

New laws affect commercial property owners

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Three bills with implications for owners of commercial real estate were approved by the General Assembly and have been signed by Gov. Mitch Daniels.

One of the bills, House Bill 1005, loosens requirements for taking advantage of the state’s industrial recovery tax credit when renovating vacant industrial buildings. Few property owners have taken advantage of the credits, which are awarded by the Indiana Economic Development Corp.

The law signed by the governor reduces the minimum age of buildings eligible for the credit, from 20 years to 15. It also opens the credit up to smaller buildings. The previous minimum size of 250,000 square feet was reduced to 50,000 square feet through the end of 2014. The minimum rises to 100,000 after that date. To be considered vacant, a property can be no more than 25 percent occupied, but now a building need only be vacant at least a year to qualify for the credit. The previous requirement was two years.

Another new law discourages municipalities from charging apartment-building owners exorbitant inspection and registration fees. Some cities had started imposing the fees as a way to recoup revenue they’ve lost because of property tax caps. The law prohibits cities and towns from funneling such fee revenue to general operating budgets.

Finally, apartment owners were successful in shepherding through changes to controversial immigration legislation. The bill passed and signed by the governor no longer requires landlords to verify the legal status of tenants. According to the bill’s original language, landlords whose tenants were found to be in the country illegally could have been charged with a misdemeanor or Class D felony. That part of the bill was removed because it ran counter to the federal Fair Housing Act.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT