IBJNews

New spending pushes Indiana Senate air war above $20M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Spending in Indiana's tight U.S. Senate race topped $20 million this week, with new spending from the conservative Club for Growth, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's super PAC, and national Democrats and Republicans.

This week marks the most expensive yet in the closely watched race between Republican Richard Mourdock and Democratic U.S. Rep. Joe Donnelly. The candidates have been locked in a dead heat since the May primary, when the tea party-backed Mourdock unexpectedly ousted longtime GOP Sen. Richard Lugar.

The Club for Growth is spending $600,000 in Indiana this week, club spokesman Barney Keller said Wednesday. Reid's group is buying up $800,000 of air time, according to an aide for Mourdock's campaign and a Democratic source who are both tracking ad buys. Both spoke on condition of anonymity because the campaigns do not publicly track figures.

The Democratic source also said that groups supporting Mourdock are spending $2.1 million over the one-week period that began Tuesday, while $1.6 million is coming from Donnelly supporters. It's the most expensive one-week total yet in a race that has already blown away previous spending levels in any contest for a U.S. Senate seat in Indiana.

A new ad attacking Mourdock began airing this week from the super PAC backed by Reid, a Democratic Nevada senator.

"Washington's a mess, and Richard Mourdock would make it worse, saying 'It's time for confrontation,'" the narrator says over grainy footage of Mourdock jabbing his finger in the air. The ad then says Mourdock's first "confrontation" was threatening jobs by opposing the federal bailout of Chrysler.

The latest ad supporting Mourdock was released Wednesday and continues the strategy of tying Donnelly to Democratic leaders in Washington.

"Joe Donnelly's plan for the Senate? Keep Harry Reid and the liberal Democrats in charge," the narrator says as yellowed photos of Donnelly, Reid, President Barack Obama and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi flash on screen.

Keller, the Club for Growth spokesman, said the latest ad shows that Donnelly is "just another liberal" who supported Washington spending on wasteful projects, such as the Lobster Institute in Maine.

Donnelly has pushed back against that argument throughout his campaign, noting most recently that he voted with Republican Speaker John Boehner about 60 percent of the time.

Donnelly had trouble competing with Mourdock's fundraising from July through September, raising half of the $3 million Mourdock pulled in. But new campaign finance rules, pioneered by Mourdock supporter Jim Bopp, have diminished the role of candidate spending and helped turn Indiana's Senate race into a faceoff between Reid's super PAC and former President George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove's super PAC.

According to a Republican tally of spending booked through Monday, the top four players in Indiana's Senate race are Rove's Crossroads GPS, which has spent $3.8 million; the Mourdock campaign, with $2.1 million; the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, with $2.1 million; and Reid's Majority PAC, which has spent $1.9 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT