IBJNews

Report: Indiana far short of funding teacher pensions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana is among the nation's five most underfunded teacher pension programs, with the assets to cover just over a third of the benefits it owes by state law, according to a report released this month by school-choice advocates.

But according to a co-author of the report, the state is an unusual case in the sample, and is in that bottom-level designation for a different reason than the other states.

The national study by the Foundation for Educational Choice and the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research found that unfunded pension liabilities — the gap between the benefits promised to retired schoolteachers and the assets of the fund used to pay them — for all 50 states total almost $1 trillion. That's nearly three times the $332 billion state officials have on their combined balance sheets for unfunded liabilities.

Only five plans are 75-percent funded or better, the report said. West Virginia is cited as the most underfunded, at an estimated 31-percent funded. The Indiana State Teachers' Retirement Fund is short by about $15 million, and has the assets to cover about 35 percent of its liabilities, the report said.

The TRF had no comment on the report, said spokeswoman Joy Smith, but provided information about how the fund works.

The Teachers' Retirement Fund administers a two-part benefit: an annuity savings account and a monthly pension benefit, Smith said. Employees must contribute 3 percent of their pretax income to the annuity savings account. Many employers pick up this contribution as a benefit to the worker.

Employers make a contribution for the monthly pension benefit, she said. As of January 1, 2009, that rate is 7 percent of an employee's salary.

The state's teacher retirement benefits are divided into two funds. One includes teachers hired before July 1, 1995, and was established by the state legislature as a pay-as-you-go plan, Smith said. It is by definition not pre-funded, and annual pension payments are appropriated by the legislature.

The other plan includes teachers hired after June 30, 1995. It was established as an actuarially funded plan, meaning future liabilities are funded by contributions to the plan as a percentage of the member's salary as it is earned, Smith said. As of June 30 last year, that plan was 93-percent funded, according to Smith.

Common practice establishes 80 percent as the minimum to be considered healthy, she said.

To combat the unfunded pension liabilities in the first plan, the state legislature created the Pension Stabilization Fund.

Indiana stands out among the bottom five because it moved so recently from a pay-as-you-go-system, and because its general public employee fund, which does not include teachers, is in such good shape, said Josh Barro, a research fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research who co-wrote the study.

"Most of the states that had very low funding are states that generally have pension problems across the board, for teachers and non-teachers," Barro said.

Indiana's general public employee retirement fund, however, is actually in extremely good shape, and the state has a AAA credit rating, Barro said.

The study authors used financial data provided by the teacher pension funds, Barro said. In Indiana's case, the report's calculations of assets include both what's in the new fund and what's in the pension stabilization fund for teachers hired before 1996, Barro said. The report includes the accrued liabilities for all the teachers in both plans, he said.

Nate Schnellenberger, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, says the report could be misleading and believes it could be used to give legislators a reason to cut teacher pensions.

"Part of the report implies that this high pension teachers are getting is a big burden on the state, when in actuality, Indiana's pension is low compared to a lot of other states," Schnellenberger said. "I'll say this — it would be very difficult for somebody to retire and just live off their TRF pension."

Barro said the report is merely making clear that a problem exists.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT