IBJNews

Report: Indiana far short of funding teacher pensions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana is among the nation's five most underfunded teacher pension programs, with the assets to cover just over a third of the benefits it owes by state law, according to a report released this month by school-choice advocates.

But according to a co-author of the report, the state is an unusual case in the sample, and is in that bottom-level designation for a different reason than the other states.

The national study by the Foundation for Educational Choice and the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research found that unfunded pension liabilities — the gap between the benefits promised to retired schoolteachers and the assets of the fund used to pay them — for all 50 states total almost $1 trillion. That's nearly three times the $332 billion state officials have on their combined balance sheets for unfunded liabilities.

Only five plans are 75-percent funded or better, the report said. West Virginia is cited as the most underfunded, at an estimated 31-percent funded. The Indiana State Teachers' Retirement Fund is short by about $15 million, and has the assets to cover about 35 percent of its liabilities, the report said.

The TRF had no comment on the report, said spokeswoman Joy Smith, but provided information about how the fund works.

The Teachers' Retirement Fund administers a two-part benefit: an annuity savings account and a monthly pension benefit, Smith said. Employees must contribute 3 percent of their pretax income to the annuity savings account. Many employers pick up this contribution as a benefit to the worker.

Employers make a contribution for the monthly pension benefit, she said. As of January 1, 2009, that rate is 7 percent of an employee's salary.

The state's teacher retirement benefits are divided into two funds. One includes teachers hired before July 1, 1995, and was established by the state legislature as a pay-as-you-go plan, Smith said. It is by definition not pre-funded, and annual pension payments are appropriated by the legislature.

The other plan includes teachers hired after June 30, 1995. It was established as an actuarially funded plan, meaning future liabilities are funded by contributions to the plan as a percentage of the member's salary as it is earned, Smith said. As of June 30 last year, that plan was 93-percent funded, according to Smith.

Common practice establishes 80 percent as the minimum to be considered healthy, she said.

To combat the unfunded pension liabilities in the first plan, the state legislature created the Pension Stabilization Fund.

Indiana stands out among the bottom five because it moved so recently from a pay-as-you-go-system, and because its general public employee fund, which does not include teachers, is in such good shape, said Josh Barro, a research fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research who co-wrote the study.

"Most of the states that had very low funding are states that generally have pension problems across the board, for teachers and non-teachers," Barro said.

Indiana's general public employee retirement fund, however, is actually in extremely good shape, and the state has a AAA credit rating, Barro said.

The study authors used financial data provided by the teacher pension funds, Barro said. In Indiana's case, the report's calculations of assets include both what's in the new fund and what's in the pension stabilization fund for teachers hired before 1996, Barro said. The report includes the accrued liabilities for all the teachers in both plans, he said.

Nate Schnellenberger, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, says the report could be misleading and believes it could be used to give legislators a reason to cut teacher pensions.

"Part of the report implies that this high pension teachers are getting is a big burden on the state, when in actuality, Indiana's pension is low compared to a lot of other states," Schnellenberger said. "I'll say this — it would be very difficult for somebody to retire and just live off their TRF pension."

Barro said the report is merely making clear that a problem exists.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT