IBJNews

Reports of owner discord circulate around IndyCar CEO Bernard

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The excitement over a strong Indianapolis 500 didn't last very long for IndyCar.

A Wednesday report on Speed.com detailed an alleged revolt by several team owners to oust IndyCar CEO Randy Bernard. Rumors of discord had been present at Indianapolis Motor Speedway last week, threatening to overshadow the biggest race of the year.

The report claims IndyCar founder Tony George and a handful of team owners are behind a charge to have Bernard fired. Also listed were team owners John Barnes, Kevin Kalkhoven, Michael Andretti and his father, Mario.

Michael Andretti immediately denounced the report on Twitter, calling it "sensationalism" and saying there "is no lynch mob!"

Before Sunday's race, Bernard tried to defuse any controversy and it seemed to work as the race was generally regarded as one of the best in history.

Only the focus now is not on the race, the decent television ratings or the need to build some momentum for the series. Instead, it went back to business as usual as the owners seemed to pick up right where they were before the race.

Bernard confirmed the mounting speculation in his own tweet Tuesday night, admitting "it is true that an owner is calling others trying to get me fired. I have had several owners confirm this."

Team owners have been upset over several issues, most consistently the escalating costs to field IndyCar's new car this season. The price tag is much higher than what Bernard quoted, and money has been a sore spot since before the season began.

But the angst has escalated of late, particularly among the Chevrolet team owners. Chevy lost a pair of appeals protesting a component of rival Honda's turbocharger, and the anger spread to other manufacturers after IndyCar levied fines throughout the garage that reached $300,000 for 19 infractions among 13 different teams.

"I've been involved now in racing for 28 months, and what I've seen is this unbelievable amount of passion to win, desire to win, not only from drivers but mainly from team owners," Bernard said last weekend. "When a call is not made in their direction, of course they're going to be upset."

Roger Penske, team owner for the drivers who won the first four races of the season, was initially not speaking to Bernard after the Honda rulings. But he met with Bernard at Indy, and insisted to The Associated Press he's supportive of the series, the CEO and not a part of any plot to have Bernard ousted.

Andretti, meanwhile, has been one of the most supportive owners in IndyCar this season. Besides his three full-time entries, he fielded two more cars in the Indy 500 to help get to the full 33-car field. He also fields entries in the Mazda Road to Indy developmental series.

And he's stepped up as a promoter this year to take over the races in Milwaukee and Baltimore, which were both in danger of vanishing. He took over Milwaukee when IndyCar needed a 16th race to complete its schedule, and stepped in at Baltimore last month.

Still, the discord is nothing new for open-wheel racing, where infighting and power struggles have long plagued the series.

Bernard inherited it all when he was hired to replace George, who was ousted by his family after years of mounting costs. In just over two years, Bernard has brought renewed enthusiasm to IndyCar, reduced debt, increased attendance and television ratings, introduced a new car and brought in multiple engine manufacturers.

There's also some parity in IndyCar, despite the early dominance by Penske drivers.

The Indy 500, which had a record 34 lead changes, featured big finishes for small teams. Among them was Oriol Servia, who gave Dreyer & Reinbold its best Indy result ever with a fourth-place finish. It was the team's first race with a Chevrolet engine since it ditched Lotus in early May.

Justin Wilson was seventh for Dale Coyne Racing, and Alex Tagliani was 12th for Bryan Herta Autosport, which sat out of last month's race at Brazil to regroup and defect from Lotus to Honda.

IndyCar's next race is Sunday, the Detroit Belle Isle Grand Prix. It's the first major race in Detroit since 2008.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Owner DENY Aero-kits in 2013
    The IMS needs to force those rascal owners to make and buy aero kits in 2013!

    Who's running this thing anyway? Randy, make them pay for it....make them built aerokits!!!
  • Burl is so funny
    Rule Book? Rule Book? that is what started this latest drahmer. The rule book is whatever the series comes up with at the moment. Them dastardly owners would be happy with a rule book.
  • Well said, Chief.
    IMS must be France-like in control of the sport. It is about the Indy 500. IMS owns it. Runs it. Lives it. Loves it. Mr. Penske, you are invited to participate. Here is the rule book. Here are the edicts. No? Thank you for your service. It has been grand. Mr. Chip? What's that? No? Thank you. We shall replace the target cars with the automobiles and driver's offered to us by, for example, Mr. Brown from a different town. He has one million dollars in sponsorship and Oriol Sevia and Townsend Bell eager to pilot his Dad's Root Beer-Sponsored cars.
  • Decent TV ratings?
    4.3 fast overnights were up 7.7% over last years 4.0. Finals aren't in yet.

    The only way this series will EVER get on it's feet is for the Hulmans to OWN, lock stock and barrel all the cars/engines/owners/teams. Yes, run it as a business....the owners work for IMS. THEN you will have total control.

    Otherwise, the Hulman family is neither strong enough or savy enough to weather these storms. Frankly, IMHO IMS shouldn't budge one iota and tell 'em if they don't like it they can go pound sand. Taht'll teach 'em !!! Go get 'em Randy!
  • Not about the owners
    The "owners" must realize the Indy 500 and the Series is not abotu them. Any of them. If they took their toys to go play somewhere else, there are plenty of people who would show up to replace them. They may not have as deep pockets or even as sophisticated an operation, but Ganassty and Pimpski could go away tomorrow and only a small handful of hardcores would care. Whoever came in with a new team would put cars on the track and the races would run.

    Andretti and Foyt hav always stepped up when they were needed. They too could go away and the results would be the same. New owners to replace them. But at least they have contributed more for the overall good then many of the other spoiled brats. And I am not saying they are golden.

    Ganassty and Pimpski, the sport will be better off when they finally do go away.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT