Skarbeck: Smart capital allocation by CEO can swell returns

Ken Skarbeck
August 24, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Ken Skarbeck InvestingThe masterful allocation of a company’s cash flow, over long periods, is the single greatest determinant of shareholder value for an investor. This is the conclusion in the 2012 book “The Outsiders” by William Thorndike.

Thorndike examined eight companies and uses the word “iconoclast” to define these CEOs who challenged conventional management norms and outperformed the S&P 500 by 20-fold and their peer groups by a multiple of seven.

For these “outsider” CEOs, growth in per-share value, driven by savvy capital allocation, was the key to superior investment performance. Another common thread was thumbing their nose at standard protocol, like avoiding communication with Wall Street and running their businesses with independent thinking.

A goal for many traditional CEOs is to make their companies bigger. These outsider CEOs sometimes shrank their companies through stock buybacks, spinoffs and closing underperforming divisions.

Capital-allocating CEOs think more like an investor instead of a manager and understand the difference between price and value. They are willing to buy back stock in large quantities when it is cheap. And, conversely, when their stock is overpriced, they use it as currency for value-accreting acquisitions. They avoid overpaying for acquisitions—a mistake made by many CEOs interested in growing the overall pie.

Thorndike notes that there are three sources of capital—cash flow from operations, issuing debt, or issuing equity. When allocating that capital, the CEO has five choices—invest internally, make acquisitions, pay dividends, pay down debt or repurchase stock.

Investors should periodically analyze the past capital allocation decisions of their portfolio CEOs and measure whether they are increasing per-share value. There are three simple ways to measure CEOs’ performance—the compound annual return to shareholders during their tenure, that return compared to a peer group of companies during the same period, and a comparison against a broad market index like the S&P 500.

Verisign, the provider of Internet infrastructure services, is a good recent example. In 2010, the company sold a large subsidiary for $1.2 billion. Since then, Verisign has bought back 41 million shares of stock at an average price of $32 per share and paid special dividends of $3 in 2010 and $2.75 per share in 2011. Verisign’s stock now trades for about $49 per share.

Travelers Insurance, since its first repurchase authorization in 2006, has acquired 362 million shares for a total cost of $18.8 billion at an average price of $52 per share. Even though the company has barely grown revenue, profit or total assets over that time, the per-share book value has advanced from $37 to $67, primarily due to share repurchases. Travelers stock has significantly outperformed the S&P 500 and the S&P Property & Casualty index.

Another example is Precision Castparts CEO Mark Donegan, who has been masterful with a series of value-creating acquisitions, despite keeping a low profile and shunning Wall Street’s desire for earnings guidance.

Identifying a CEO who possesses superior capital allocation skills can add exponential value to your portfolio.•


Skarbeck is managing partner of Indianapolis-based Aldebaran Capital LLC, a money-management firm. His column appears every other week. Views expressed are his own. He can be reached at 818-7827 or ken@aldebarancapital.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. "This was a very localized, Indiana issue," he said. As in, Indiana failed to expand Medicaid to cover its poor citizens resulting in the loss of essential medical services, including this EMS company. Well done, Indiana GOP. Here are the real death panels: GOP state governments who refuse to expand Medicaid for political reasons.

  2. In the "one for all, all for none" socialist doctrine the sick die...this plus obama"care" equates to caucasian genocide plus pushed flight to cities thus further eroding the conservative base and the continualed spiral toward complete liberal/progressive/marxist America.

  3. There is a simple reason why WISH is not reporting on this story. LIN has others stations in different markets that are affiliated with CBS. Reporting about CBS blindsiding WISH/LIN due to CBS's greed and bullying tatics would risk any future negoations LIN will have with CBS in other markets.

  4. My best always! Dave Wilson

  5. How did Columbus, Ohio pull off a car share service without a single dollar of public subsidies? They must not have a mayor who is on the take like Indianapolis. Daimler Benz offers Columbus residents their Smart Cars on a market-driven basis: "This has some neat features. Cars don’t have to be picked up and dropped off at fixed points. You find one with your smart phone based on GPS, and drop it off anywhere in the service area you can find a spot – even at a meter. These cars aren’t required to feed the meter so you get free on street parking while using them. I was told this system was put in place on a market basis without subsidies – and that the vendor actually pays the city for the use of the meters." http://www.urbanophile.com/2014/05/26/checking-in-on-columbus/