IBJNews

Sun King brewery lands tax breaks for expansion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Sun King Brewing Co. is preparing for another round of growth and has landed city and state incentives to help offset the investment.

According to to a tax-incentives deal approved Wednesday afternoon by the Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission, the downtown Indianapolis brewery on North College Avenue said it is prepared to spend $2.1 million on additional brewing, logistics and information-technology equipment, which will allow it to add 20 employees by 2016.

The new jobs would pay an average of $17.10 an hour, slightly more than the $16.91 average wage paid to the 35 existing employees who would be retained through the abatement, according to city documents.

Sun King’s investment initially should increase the assessed value of its property by $840,000, the city said. The brewery is expected to save $97,020 in personal property taxes during the abatement period and pay $10,080. The brewery would pay an estimated $19,769 in personal property taxes annually after the abatement expires.

In a separate deal reached with the state and announced Wednesday, Sun King said it planned to spend $3.9 million to add 1,850 square feet to its existing 2,700- square-foot facility. The brewery will house 240 barrel fermentation tanks to allow for an increase in beer production.

Sun King told the state that the expansion would help it increase employment by 32 workers by 2016.

The Indiana Economic Development Corp. offered Sun King up to $240,000 in conditional tax credits and up to $60,000 in training grants based on the job-creation plans.

Sun King was launched in mid-2009 and produced 5,000 barrels of beer in its first year of operation. It doubled that amount in 2011 and brewed 18,000 barrels last year.

Sun King is the second-largest brewer in Indiana, behind only Three Floyds Brewing Co. in Munster, which produces about 23,000 barrels annually and also is growing quickly.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • No Way
    And the poor folks in the Avondale area get NOTHING. Wow - way to go MDC.
  • Give it to them!
    Great company, great beer, Sun King will generate 20 jobs +, and likely more in the service industry. Yes to the abatement please.
  • Abatements are conditional
    Patti, the city isn't giving Sun King $97K. An abatement is a reduction, not a gift. In addition, abatements are conditional. If the company doesn't meet the conditions, it will be required to pay the taxes.
  • Help Sun King grow
    Yes to the abatement, because this growth will result in much more than just 20 jobs. Sun King has a national reputation that reflects well on Indianapolis. Out-of-towners come to Indianapolis to visit Sun King (and our city's other fine microbreweries), and they spend additional money on food and lodging while they're here. Sun King is a terrific community partner to many Central Indiana organizations. And they're doing all this from a set of buildings that would otherwise have stood empty.
  • Tax Abatement
    So, let me get this straight....We give them $97K and MAYBE 20 people will get jobs in two years. And what penalty will be assessed if the jobs don't materialize? NO to the abatement.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT