IBJNews

Union looks to settle with workers over right-to-work issue

Kathleen McLaughlin
May 17, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A local union charged with violating Indiana’s right-to-work law is looking to settle with six workers who say their dues were improperly collected.

William Groth, who represents Graphic Communications International Local 17M, said he anticipates a settlement in the National Labor Relations Board case brought against the union, as well as Montreal-based Domtar Paper Co., which produces business forms in Indianapolis.

But there could be disagreement about when the law should take effect on the union’s contract, and how much the workers are owed. The National Right to Work Foundation, which helped the local workers file their unfair labor practice charges, said that since the union’s contract with Domtar expired March 15, the dues collection should have stopped then.

Groth said the contract remained in effect until a new one was ratified on April 30, and he believes that should have been the cut-off date.

Timing is one issue that the National Labor Relations Board will have to deal with in Indiana right-to-work cases, Groth said. “There will be some disputes that arise because the law wasn’t drafted with crystal clarity,” he said.

Groth didn’t know how much Graphic Communications charges in dues, but he said, “We’re talking about very small sums of money here.”

The six workers who filed unfair labor practice charges May 6 are Broatus Lambert, Lawrence Langworth, Christopher McKay, Kenneth Rosenfeld, Kevin Schrader and William Schwier.

Domtar was named in the May 6 charge because the company collects the dues, while the local union accepts the money.

Domtar employs more than 10,000 workers in North America. Its location at 6461 Saguaro Court in Indianapolis converts paper into business forms and other standard sizes and employs 75 people, about three-quarters of whom are represented by the union, spokesman Craig Timm said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bout Time
    Its about time the NLRB did something for the taxpayer instead of kissing the criminal unions butts. Many peole dont need the unoins representation and dont want to conrtibute to an enterprise that supports radical socialism, anti religeous policies, and pads the coffers of organized crime.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT