IBJOpinion

WESTERHAUS-RENFROW: Return to sender: Get a clue about email

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Charlotte Westerhaus-RenfrowIf I had a dollar for every time I read a news article or post about a public official getting busted for sending or exchanging inappropriate emails and texts to fellow officials, colleagues and subordinates, I’d be well on my way to financial freedom.

Day in and day out, one new headline after the next exposes the unprincipled exploits of an official who used a governmental agency or entity’s electronic mail system to send and exchange messages of a sexual nature or that contained off-color language or jokes.

What’s going on here?

Many social commentators are quick to report that there is a silver lining of sorts. Our country’s history reveals that elected and public officials and administrators, as well as business and civic leaders, have behaved badly since well before George Washington was president.

Other critics staunchly point an accusatory finger squarely at the good-ole-boys network of power and influence. They claim that male-dominated exclusionary practices—including offensive language—are still prevalent in the workplace and reinforce patriarchal systems, customs and habits that consciously and unconsciously keep women in their place.

But to be honest, women do it, too. It can be argued that fewer women offenders make the headlines because there are smaller numbers of women appointed to public leadership positions and elected to political offices. Perhaps the proverbial career-related glass ceiling not only keeps women from climbing the ladder, but also conveniently sequesters the public’s knowledge of lower and mid-level female officials and public administrators who, too, behave badly.

Are our elected and appointed officials clueless?

Maybe.

But not likely.

Everyone should know that whatever you send or open is not private. Deleted messages can be recalled. Improper messages can immediately go viral or come back to haunt the sender and the receiver for years after the messages were transmitted.

Email transmissions exchanged from and between government or public officials via agencies’ electronic mail systems are not like private, person-to-person communications. These types of emails are considered public documents, open to the public’s view. Moreover, email exchanges can be used in a lawsuit in the same way as any written letter or memorandum.

But the crux of the issue is not about avoiding lawsuits and doing things right. It is really about doing the right thing.

In this day and age, do some of our elected and appointed public officials really believe that sending and sharing lewd emails is doing the right thing? Let’s hope not.

However, if they do, these officials need to get it. The public rightfully expects them to adhere to the highest values of ethics, maintain standards of uncompromising integrity, and conduct themselves in a professional manner. They need to know that public confidence is eroded when leaders behave contrary to ideals of impartiality, temperament and fitness.

Elected officials and appointed pubic officials are responsible for the welfare of the citizens—all of them. This includes an obligation to take care of the public’s interest in all their official actions, including the sending and receiving of emails on governmental agencies’ systems.

Time after the time, citizens are making it crystal clear—sending and exchanging emails and texts that contain discriminatory, disrespectful, inappropriate, lewd and off-color jokes and language by elected or appointed public officials is not like sharing a bad joke at a party.

It is not funny. It is not amusing. It is not acceptable.•

__________

Westerhaus-Renfrow is a senior lecturer at the Kelley School of Business at IUPUI, president of ChangePro LLC, and a former vice president of diversity and inclusion at the NCAA. Send comments on this column to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Doing the right thing helps us all!
    Very well said! What is good for the goose..is good for the gander. There is always room for people to correct their ways or mistakes and start doing what is right.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

  2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

  3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

  4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

  5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?

ADVERTISEMENT