IBJNews

WFYI seeks more money from public broadcasting audience

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Public broadcaster WFYI is counting on its listeners and viewers to open their wallets in a big way this fall.

And there’s little reason to doubt they’ll pull through before the fiscal year ends Sept. 30. Last fiscal year, when state support fell 50 percent and corporate sponsorships dried up, individual giving rose slightly, to $3.38 million, despite the weak economy.

wright-lloyd-mug Wright

“Individuals that can support WFYI recognize we need them more than ever,” said CEO Lloyd Wright, 57, who’s led the organization since 1989.

The TV and radio broadcaster will ask more of that loyal audience in the next year, as it gears up for a campaign to grow its endowment well beyond its current $2.2 million. Wright declined to state how much WFYI might go after, but said, “We would like to grow that dramatically.”

The radio station, FM 90.1, has 115,000 weekly listeners, who, according to Arbitron, listen for an average of one hour per day. The TV station, Channel 20, reaches farther geographically, so its audience is about three times greater.

But across the country, public radio is enjoying the greateer growth. The national audience for public radio has grown from 20 million to 35 million in the past 10 years, said Tom Thomas, co-CEO of the Station Resource Group, an association of public radio stations in Takoma Park, Md.

“The principal driver is news and information programming,” he said.

During the recession, public radio audiences generally maintained their giving level, or increased their support, said Helen Kennedy, president of Portland, Ore.-based Lewis Kennedy Associates, which advises several public broadcasters on fundraising.

On the other hand, public television stations have struggled with high costs, an issue that troubles commercial television, too, Kennedy said.

Public radio listeners are an educated, affluent, left-leaning group, according to the Station Resource Group, and they apparently find NPR’s drive-time shows indispensable.

“They are essentially supporting what they use every day,” Kennedy said.

Individual donors are the largest source of revenue for most public radio stations, Thomas said. At WFYI, the $3.4 million executives expect to raise before closing their fiscal year on Sept. 30 will represent more than 35 percent of a $9.15 million budget.

Development Director Theresa Tetrault said WFYI still needs to raise about $300,000 to reach the $3.4 million. As of the end of July, the pace of fundraising was 4 percent ahead of last year.

WFYI says 40 percent of its members choose to support both TV and radio, 35 percent support only television, while 25 percent select only radio.

The next-largest category of support, about 25 percent, is corporate sponsors.

“We’ve had some encouraging signs in recent weeks, but it’s been a challenge,” Wright said. “Corporations often don’t know what to make of WFYI.”

Paying for programs

The local broadcaster pays PBS about $1 million a year for its programs, which make up about 70 percent of the television schedule, and about $700,000 a year to NPR. The national radio network provides drive-time shows such as “Morning Edition” and “All Things Considered.”

Adding more local content is a key part of the strategy WFYI is drawing up to support its endowment push.

“That’s the most expensive part of our operation, creating local content from concept to completed program,” Wright said. “Yet at the same time we think it’s an extremely important part of the mission.”

WFYI produces shows such as “Indiana Week in Review,” a political roundtable that airs on both television and radio.

Digital rollout

The conversion from analog to digital technology in late 2007 created new TV and radio channels. WFYI is working with other public TV stations in Indiana to fill one of the channels, 20.3, with Indiana-centric programs.

The stations will introduce a three-hour block in late October and hope to see it evolve into a 24/7 Indiana channel. The block may include the show “Around Indiana” and arts and public affairs programming.

But much of the growth in local content will probably be on the radio side, Wright said, because production costs are lower.

Many public radio stations use local hosts during the national programs, as does WFYI, but few public television stations can afford to put together their own news broadcasts, Kennedy said.

WFYI radio recently launched a public-affairs talk show, “No Limits,” hosted by Franklin College journalism dean John Krull.

“We’re really proud of the radio station and trying to localize it more,” Wright said.

Local content has been a boon to some public radio stations, Thomas said.

“When that’s done consistently and done well, that produces higher listening and higher giving,” he said.

Just two years ago, WFYI’s audience supported the move into a larger headquarters at 1630 N. Meridian St.

The broadcaster paid $8.5 million for the 110,000-square-foot former headquarters of Indiana Energy and spent $11.6 million to equip it. The move hasn’t added significant operating costs because WFYI leases nearly half the space to office tenants.

WFYI also was fortunate to receive a major grant that closed out a $20.3 million capital campaign that October, just as the stock market tanked. But the plan also counted on the sale of WFYI’s existing buildings at 1401 and 1433 N. Meridian.

The first building sold last year for an undisclosed amount, but the latter is still on the market for $700,000. Wright hopes the next campaign will help eliminate the remainder of a $1 million bridge loan.

WFYI shed about $800,000 from its budget in January 2009 because of anticipated losses in donor and government support. The stations cut 10 of its 83 staff members and management salaries 5 percent.

The organization ended in the red in 2009, and executives blame steep cuts in state funding. Because of the state’s own budget crisis, Gov. Mitch Daniels cut all public broadcast funding in half. WFYI’s share fell from about $500,000 to $240,000.

That was enough to leave WFYI with a $140,000 deficit, Tetrault said.

WFYI reported a larger loss—$525,000—in a filing with the Internal Revenue Service. The not-for-profit used different accounting standards—including factoring in depreciation on equipment—in that report. Combined with the preceding year’s budget gap, the organization had a two-year operating loss of $1.5 million, the filing said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Please call me!
    Your SouthWest Florida station. Please call me!!!239 440 4519
  • WFYI Business Incubator
    WFYI is on the right track.

    They have become an incubator for new local programming providing office space, equipment, and distribution to upcoming media based companies.

    Its now the time to take it to the next level.
  • CNN Made Atlanta
    WFYI's public broadcasting's value is in high quality,locally produced programming like Inside Indiana Business, Indiana Week in Review, & Across Indiana which are statewide in scope and could easily be broadcast in South Bend, Fort Wayne, Evansville, and places in between. We need more of this.

    What does Indiana want to be known for nationally? Unique nationally syndicated programming is a worthwhile goal with many benefits, however local relevance is usually lost, and national content often generic to be appealing to everyone.
  • National-caliber local programming
    What is needed is for WFYI (radio and/or TV) to acquire both the ambition and funding to locally produce a program that can be syndicated on PBS stations nationally, such as WHYY's radio program "Fresh Air" or the Diane Rehm show out of American University in DC. 3-4 hours daily of local programming for local audiences, especially with the production quality that is currently on evidence, will be deadly. Growth will come from producing something that is valuable nationally.
  • WFYI
    PBS channel 19 (Muncie) is more interesting and less provincial than the Indianapolis station. But, then, channel 19 is affiliated with Ball State University.
  • PBS radio-yes. PBS TV-no
    My car radio is turned on the radio station constantly. I really do enjoy it.

    But, I have gripes with the TV station. Too often, National PBS has advertized a certain program and I am looking forward to it. But, this local station does not show it! This happens too often. Thank goodness I can also get channel 19 PBS TV station. I watch it alot more than channel 3.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT