IBJOpinion

WEB REVIEW: With Groupon and its ilk, daily deals drive demand

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Jim Cota

A few months ago, something interesting happened.

A small company in Chicago called Groupon sent out an e-mail offering to sell a Gap gift card with a $50 value for $25. It was part of a marketing campaign—fully endorsed by Gap, by the way—to test the waters with a national campaign of this type. With no prior frame of reference, neither Groupon nor Gap had any idea what to expect, but I think it’s fair to assume the results exceeded their wildest aspirations.

But first, a little background ...

Groupon is a “deal-of-the-day” website created by CEO Andrew Mason and now operating in more than 150 markets around the world. The name refers to the business model: The company offers one “Groupon” per day in each of the markets it serves. If a certain number of people sign up for the offer, the deal becomes available to all. If the predetermined minimum isn’t met, no one gets the deal that day.

This approach serves two purposes:

First, it provides some risk mitigation for the retailer, who can treat the coupon as quantity discounts and sales-promotion efforts.

Second, it helps spread the word through social groups, as people who want the deal tell their friends about it to increase the chances of reaching the tipping point.

Until the Gap test, Groupon was known for its daily deals for local brick-and-mortar stores. This was the first time they dipped their toes in the national campaign waters to test results. It seems they caught lightning in a bottle.

CEO Mason explains, “We’ve worked with plenty of national brands, but this is the first time we’ve featured the same business in every city simultaneously.” By the end of the day, more than 440,000 Groupons were sold, bringing in a little more than $11 million and, one can imagine, lots of new Groupon customers.

Of course, to be successful, customers need to hear about the deal. Groupon handles this by sending out daily e-mail messages, updating its apps running on smartphones, posting the deal on its website, and sending out messages via social-network platforms like Twitter and Facebook. Customers then help spread the word through their networks, helping to cast a wider net.

Overall, the success has been astonishing. For local stores working to bring in traffic and sales, discounting makes perfect sense, especially in this economy. To be viable long term, of course, the stores will need to convert these new buyers into repeat customers, something that has dogged business owners across all markets, across all time.

From the perspective of the delivery mechanism, however, the results are far more compelling. With the marketing medium taking a cut of sales somewhere near half (and Groupon being recently recognized by Forbes magazine as the fastest-growing company ever), competitors have come flooding in.

Locally, there are a few that are working to capture market share from the de facto leader. Bogotown (bogotown.com) is a locally owned company specializing in half-price deals (hence the name: buy one, get one.) Half Off Depot (www.halfoffdepot.com) was created in Atlanta in 2008 and now operates in more than 26 cities, including Indianapolis. Living Social (www.livingsocial.com) was founded in Washington, D.C., in 2008 and is operating in almost 100 markets. The list continues to grow—and the differentiations continue to blur.

All of these work on the same basic premise: Make an offer to customers that is at or better than 50-percent off, use the power of the deal and their social networks to spread the word, and wait for the sales to roll in. Stores get an immediate influx of cash and can spread the impact of the sales over time. (For example, I bought a three-pack pass for rock climbing that is still waiting to be used. For some merchants, part of the benefit of the deal is that many paid-for coupons will go unused.)

The problem, of course, is how to differentiate. If each of these competitors can’t find a way to stand out from the crowd, the winner will be the network with the best deals. And the network with the best deals will likely turn out to be the one that delivers the best results.

It will be interesting to see how these “results” are defined over the next few months. If someone offers the stores a better return (even if it’s a smaller number of sales), they’ll have an opportunity to make a name for themselves. All this leads straight to the ongoing debate about the wisdom of adopting a discounting strategy and the potential harm it can do to your pricing structure and value proposition. But we’ll leave that for another time.

The good news is that the consumer wins, regardless of which of these delivery mechanisms ends up the king.•

__________

Cota is creative director of Rare Bird Inc., a full-service advertising agency specializing in the use of new technologies. His column appears monthly. He can be reached at jim@rarebirdinc.com.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Make it local
    With Indiana needing business to survive, we should look to www.groupsnip.com for marketing help. They offer the same benefits as Groupon only pay merchants a much higher return and pay quickly. They are based in Lafayette and are launching in Indianapolis soon.
  • Groupon
    Groupon is certainly an innovative creation that allows people to get huge savings on all kinds of products and services.

    A great site to use to find these deals and sales in your area is http://www.dailydealpool.com. They'll send you a daily email with the best buys for you.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT