World Cup offers sports at its best

July 10, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

Bill Benner’s [June 28] column on the World Cup resonated with many of us in Indianapolis for a variety of reasons.

First, soccer is pure sport, in the best and most meaningful sense of the word. It is a given that any professional sport, such as football, basketball or soccer, has talent on display that is extraordinary. Soccer players, as it turns out, are more highly valued than any other athletes, based on their salaries and the incredible transfer fees paid by one team to another for a specific talent. Consider: Last year, $130 million was paid by one team to gain the playing rights for one player. Imagine that.

But talent aside, we love sports ultimately for the drama they provide. The victory. The defeat. The sweat. Sports provide the complete package in an exciting, breathtaking, human competition. Who could ask for anything more?

As an example, look at the recent World Cup match between Ghana and Uruguay. The eyes of 1 billion Africans were on the only remaining African team from the six that started. Ghana had a shot on goal with no time left in the match, blocked by a handball violation. Ghana had victory in its grasp with a simple penalty shot, which most often goes in. The best player on the team kicked the ball and it hit the crossbar and missed. One billion people who in one moment felt assured of victory were now crushed. Crushed. Eventually, Ghana lost. The Uruguay team members were stunned that they had won. The Africans were in tears.

This is the human drama of athletic competition played on an international stage, where a loss or win is for your country—or in this case, your continent—not just your city or state, as is most often seen here in the United States.

The other Indianapolis angle? Since we live in a great sports town, soccer will grow with our youth, leading to the next 2014 World Cup in Brazil and beyond that, when the World Cup is again hosted in the United States, hopefully here in Indianapolis.

This is a worthy goal, one we can achieve as a world-class city with a growing international population. This gives us all an important goal to strive for, one which can showcase the city as a cosmopolitan, multicultural center. What better way to follow up the 2012 Super Bowl?

Stephen A. Zurcher
Vice president of programsInternational Center of Indianapolis


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.