IBJNews

Ambrose jumping into Plainfield industrial market

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Ambrose Property Group, whose multi-family and office deals have made headlines recently, is staking a claim in the industrial sector with plans for a $12 million, modern bulk warehouse building in Plainfield.

Last month, the company bought a 21-acre site at Metropolis and Airtech parkways from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. The FDIC ended up with the property after the failure of Irwin Union Bank. Irwin had taken it back from Chris White, the bankrupt developer of the Metropolis retail project, which is just west of the property.

Aasif Bade, who founded Ambrose in 2008, said his firm is looking for a capital partner for the proposed 300,000-square-foot industrial building. Bade said the project could start yet this fall. If a deal isn’t assembled in the next several weeks, Ambrose will wait until spring to pursue the project.

The speculative building would be the first in the industrial segment for Ambrose, although the 15-employee company has plenty of background on the industrial side. Bade worked in industrial leasing and development for Duke Realty Corp. before striking out on his own. And Kyle Powell, an Ambrose vice president, was formerly an industrial broker with Cassidy Turley.

The Plainfield industrial submarket is among the strongest in the metro area and is awash in construction, including a 622,000-square-foot spec building Browning Investments and ProLogis started in July. The modern bulk warehouse building, on Ronald Reagan Parkway just north of Stafford Road, is expandable to 889,000 square feet. It comes online in December.

Other spec developments include a 450,000-square-foot building at Stanley and Perry roads being developed by Kansas City-based VanTrust Real Estate LLC. It broke ground in May. Atlanta-based Industrial Developments International is building 795,000 square feet of spec space in Ameriplex.

Because of their size, the Browning and IDI buildings are likely to compete for some of the same tenants, said Dennis Dye, Browning’s executive vice president. Ambrose and VanTrust would go after smaller users.

Bade said the Ambrose building would appeal to tenants as small as 120,000 square feet, distinguishing it from the larger projects being built nearby.

Ambrose wasn’t necessarily trying to break into the industrial market, Bade said. The company’s goal is simply to find opportunities to add value. “It’s an awesome opportunity for industrial,” he said of the Plainfield site.

The company has found numerous opportunities in recent months to add value in other real estate sectors.

Ambrose recently put under contract the 16-story Circle Tower office building on Monument Circle, a landmark property it intends to buy for about $6 million from Boston-based Winthrop Realty Trust. Bade told IBJ last week his firm would move its offices there from 96th and Meridian streets.

The company is also partnering with locally based The Whitsett Group on two high-profile downtown apartment projects. The conversion of the 10-story American Building at 333 N. Pennsylvania St. from offices to apartments is about to begin. Ambrose and Whitsett, an experienced developer of apartments, are also negotiating to buy the vacant Consolidated Building at 115 N. Pennsylvania St. for an apartment conversion.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Plainfield Connector
    And now, with the Plainfield Connector starting October 1st to service that area, employees will have an easier time accessing the jobs that will be created using public transportation!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT