IBJNews

Anchor Pilgrim leaving Fox59 for East Coast job

Cory Schouten
November 27, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WXIN-TV Fox59 news anchor and reporter Eva Pilgrim is leaving the local station for a similar position at the ABC affiliate in Philadelphia.

Pilgrim, who was hired by Fox59 in late 2009, anchors the station's 4 p.m. newscast and reports for the 10 p.m. newscast. She's also a back-up anchor for the primetime show. She began at Fox59 as a morning news anchor during the 4:30 a.m. to 6 a.m. segment.

eva pilgrim 15colPilgrim had risen from the morning news at Fox59 to anchor at 4 p.m. (Photo courtesy Eva Pilgrim)

She announced the move Monday via Twitter and on her blog, Everyday Eva: "When I got the call saying I got the job ... I cried ... unexpectedly," she wrote. "I was excited and happy but all of a sudden I realized how much I was going to miss Indy."

Her last day at Fox59 will be Wednesday.

News Director Lee Rosenthal said the station is interviewing in-house and external candidates to replace Pilgrim.

"It's a no-brainer," Rosenthal said of Pilgrim's move to the much-larger media market. "It's a great job. It's great to see a good person go to a good place."

Pilgrim was born in Seoul, South Korea, and grew up in a military family traveling all over the United States before her family settled down in South Carolina, according to a Fox59 bio. She attended the University of Florida and University of South Carolina.

She previously worked at TV stations in Charlotte, N.C., Bluefield, W. Va., and Columbia, S.C.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Goodbye
    Eva I wish you the best of luck on your new job. But you will be very missed and seeing on the news every afternoon. Safe travels to you on your new journey.
  • Se ya Pilgrim
    See ya later Pilgrim, (John Wayne voice)

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT