Another pay TV battle as Dish, Lin spar over fees

Associated Press
March 1, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Another battle over pay TV fees is coming down to the wire — this time over what Dish Network is paying TV station owner Lin TV Corp. to retransmit signals of 27 stations.

The stations are affiliates of CBS, Fox, NBC, ABC and the CW in 17 cities including Indianapolis, Providence, R.I., and Buffalo, N.Y.

Indianapolis CBS affiliate WISH-TV Channel 8 is among those affected.

Dish Network Corp.'s Dave Shull says Lin is demanding more than double the current fee in the first year and even more later. He says he's "frustrated" that Lin publicized the dispute, which had remained behind closed doors until Monday.

If a deal isn't reached by 2 a.m. Saturday, some satellite TV households may lose the signals of local stations. Neither side would say how many subscribers would be affected.


  • Linn
    Linn will continue to hold its viewers hostage. They dont care about their customer only about money. Hold the line Dish Network . We appreciate it.
  • why do they want money..don't we pay enough for gas n food
    I remember when I was a kid we only had 5 channels..now we have cable n dish network the penny n dime us do death..now they want more money..I guess if they don't get it ..there goes channel 8 ratings..who is winning here
  • DISH & WISH-TV, Indianapolis
    I am a DISH subscriber in Marion, IN. Have been for several years. I have also looked at my most recent DISH bill in which they raised the rates. As I understand, LIN Broadcasting is trying to double their charge to DISH to rebroadcast their signal to subscribers. These are lawyers talking amongst themselves, and hopefully, they will work out an agreement before the world comes to an end. If they don't, both will lose viewers & subscribers. Both sides, I'm sure know this as well. Local broadcast stations depend upon advertising to conduct business. As a broadcaster myself, I understand this. The reporters, photographers, producers and their assistants, as well as their families, have to eat. At the same time, I don't think it's right to pay extra for channels such as AMC, WE, etc that have their own advertising. So it is my hope that these corporations can reach an agreement because I'm too old to climb on roof and adjust my antenna! Thank you for my 2-minutes of fame!
    Yours truly,
    Mike Duncan
  • 1st Brighthouse, now DISH
    I dropped Brighthouse because of this very same issue with LIN! I picked up DISH, and now I have to go through the same thing with LIN again? Not this time. I'll buy a digital antenna and pick up the signal for FREE, and be able to watch the NCAA tourney games. Outside of that, I don't watch anything on CBS anyway.
    • and I thought
      and I thought it was dish networks faught but it turns out that it's the greed on lin's part just how much money do you think you need anyway?
    • broke
      take my money and lose a broke customer !
    • common denomator
      Gee didn't Linn have trouble with Brighthouse Cable not to long ago. History does have a way of repeating its self.
    • Pay TV, what a concept
      That sounds like comcast, double what they charge now and more later.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

    2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

    3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

    4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

    5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).