IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: State can't rely on gambling revenue

 IBJ Staff
October 24, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

When Hoosiers approved a 1988 referendum to create a lottery, only gambling critics were warning of mission creep, of a state becoming addicted to the revenue.

Well, we’ve arrived. State and, to some extent, local government has come to rely on the revenue for much more than capital projects. And now that neighboring states are launching a competitive assault on Indiana casinos, it’s time to get back to the original intent before the revenue shrivels and leaves necessary government services high and dry.

Gambling revenue was originally billed as a supplement to traditional taxes. It was to be used to build public buildings and for other capital projects—never for operating costs. The uncertain nature of the business would make it too risky to rely upon, went the thinking two decades ago.

Now, though, $600 million a year flows from riverboat casinos into the state’s general fund. Taxes on retail sales, income and motor fuel generate more money, but casino revenue is near the head of the pack, topping even corporate taxes as a source of state revenue.

But gambling revenue could be headed south.

Gamblers have cut spending as the economy soured; if they continue to put their personal financial houses in order, casinos and other venues won’t be sending big payouts to the state till for a long time to come. Hoosier Park, the horse track in Anderson, is desperate to restructure $400 million in debt, and isn’t the only site struggling to survive.

The other problem is rising competition. On Oct. 19, a Legislative Services Agency analyst told lawmakers on the Gaming Study Committee the state could lose $250 million in casino taxes if casinos planned for just across state lines in Kentucky and Ohio make it out of the ground.

Ohio voters are deciding the issue in November, and Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear continues to call for slot machines or casinos at racetracks.

Most Indiana casinos aren’t exactly inconvenient for Buckeye and Bluegrass gamblers, so it’s understandable why the neighboring states would want to persuade their residents to keep their money at home.

Indeed, the study discussed projected that Horseshoe Indiana Casino near Louisville could see 40 percent of admissions wither. The casinos near Cincinnati would see hits nearly as great.

Indiana legislators have been aware of these concerns for more than a year, and they should take action during the upcoming session to reduce reliance on gambling revenue to fund schools, courts and other core services. If they don’t want to take on the topic during a short session, they should lay groundwork for 2011, when they are charged with writing a new two-year budget.

The Kentucky and Ohio threats won’t appear overnight. Even if they’re approved, the venues probably wouldn’t be able to attract their first patrons for more than a year.

Still, this is the time to prepare. It would be a shame if Indiana services were left with too little money because lawmakers were shortsighted.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT