BREAKING: Controversial cadaver exhibit coming

Jennifer Whitson
July 11, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Atlanta-based Premier Exhibitions Inc. is looking to bring its controversial "Bodies ... the Exhibition" show to Indianapolis. The exhibit, which features cadavers that have been plasticized, dissected and posed, has been dogged by reports that the specimens used in the presentation may be the remains of tortured Chinese prisoners.

If the show opens here, it would debut mere months before the Indiana State Museum is slated to bring the more reputable "Body Worlds III" exhibit to Indianapolis. The founder of that show's company, Dr. Gunther von Hagens, has spoken out against using bodies from China, which doesn't closely regulate its specimens.

Details on an Indianapolis exhibit are foggy. A woman who answered the phone at Premier, a publicly traded company, first said the exhibit was scheduled to open in Indianapolis on July 19 and referred detailed questions to a spokeswoman, who did not return a message.

In a later phone call, a woman who answered the phone at Premier backtracked on the July 19 date.

"We're not sure of that date yet," she said. When pressed, the woman again referred questions to the spokeswoman who didn't return repeated messages.

But the company posted a job advertisement on Craigslist in late June, saying it would be hiring staff for an exhibition at Circle Centre mall that would be open for "up to eight months."

Locally based Simon Property Group owns Circle Centre. A Simon spokesman did not respond to questions.

"Bodies ... the Exhibition" has been a big attendance draw nationwide, but ran into problems while it was on display in New York City earlier this year.

The television news program "20/20" did an in-depth investigation that aired in February. For it, a news crew traveled to China and tracked down a former employee of a Chinese company that provided Premier with bodies. The unidentified employee told "20/20" that at least a third of the bodies he picked up were executed prisoners.

When "Bodies ... the Exhibition" showed in New York, State Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo took Premier to court, forcing it to turn over paperwork.

The case was settled out of court. The company was unable to "demonstrate the circumstances that led to the death of the individuals. Nor is Premier able to establish that these people consented to their remains being used in this manner," Cuomo said in a statement.

Premier was forced to post signs at the exhibition warning that the bodies were "originally received by the Chinese Bureau of Police" and that Premier cannot "independently verify that [the cadavers] do not belong to persons executed while incarcerated in Chinese prisons." The settlement also required Premier to grant refunds to consumers who attended the exhibit before the signs were posted.

The exhibit is currently running at the Cincinnati Museum Center, where it's slated to run through August. There it caused an uproar and the archdiocese banned Catholic school groups from taking field trips to it. But it still broke attendance records for the center.

The completely separate exhibition slated to run at the Indiana State Museum in January has a much clearer recording of the provenance of its cadavers. "Body Worlds III," an exhibit featuring plastinized cadavers that focuses on the working of the human heart, is run by a German-based company with a sister institute that signs up body donors and then processes the bodies.

Von Hagens, the German company's founder, told "20/20" in an interview in February that he previously processed bodies from China for use as teaching models but not for his company's exhibitions. But he stopped processing Chinese cadavers after receiving ones he suspected were executed prisoners, "20/20" reported.

On its Web site, Body Worlds states that all of the specimens used in its exhibit come through a body donation program with the exception of fetuses from historical collections predating the 1920s and a small number of organs.

State museum officials hope that any additional exhibitions don't confuse consumers about what it will be hosting.

"This is the original anatomical exhibition from the plastination institute in Germany," said museum spokeswoman Kathi Moore. "We just hope that people in Indiana will still come to see the Body Worlds exhibition when it opens here in 2009."


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.