IBJNews

Brizzi dropped plan to serve on board of Durham company

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi said he agreed this fall to serve on the board of Tim Durham’s Fair Finance Co., but changed his mind several weeks later after Durham told him a newspaper was working on an investigative story about the company.

“The whole point of being on the board was to get an education on how this stuff works,” Brizzi said Tuesday morning, several hours before FBI agents conducted a surprise raid on Fair’s Akron headquarters and the headquarters of Obsidian Enterprises, Durham’s Indianapolis-based leveraged-buyout firm.

“It seems from the article you wrote that it is more complicated than I have time for right now. So I decided against it.”

Brizzi said that Durham told him, “This stuff is going on. You probably don’t need to be in the middle of all this.”

The investigative story, published in IBJ Oct. 26, raised questions about whether Fair Finance had the financial wherewithal to repay Ohio investors who had purchased nearly $200 million in investment certificates.

The story reported that, since Durham bought the consumer-loan business in 2002, he had used it almost like a personal bank to fund a range of business interests, some of them unsuccessful. The story noted that he and related parties owe Fair more than $168 million.

Michael S. Welch, FBI special agent in charge in Indianapolis, said the agents who converged on the companies were executing search warrants. But he said those warrants are sealed and that the FBI would not provide additional comment.

John Tompkins, an Indianapolis attorney representing Durham, said today that FBI agents questioned Durham yesterday at the Los Angeles offices of National Lampoon Inc., one of several companies he leads. Tompkins would not reveal what the agents discussed.

“I will say generally that he is cooperative and will continue to be cooperative,” Tompkins said. He added that Durham believes he has done nothing wrong.

A proposed securities offering that Fair filed with the Ohio Department of Commerce’s Division of Securities on Oct. 29 says Brizzi “was elected” a director in 2009. However, Brizzi said he didn’t think he actually became a board member. And if he did, Brizzi said, it was only for a few weeks, and he did not attend a board meeting or take any official action.

Brizzi said he agreed to serve on the board because he was interested in learning more about finance from Durham, whom he described as “a buddy.” Durham also has been a major campaign contributor to Brizzi, who is in his second term as prosecutor. Campaign finance records show that Durham and his companies have donated more than $200,000 to Brizzi campaigns.

Brizzi, a Republican, would have served as one of Fair’s independent directors. One of the duties of independent directors is to decide whether to approve loans to Durham and other insiders.

Brizzi acknowledged he wouldn’t have been ideal for that role.

“If you are relying on your friends to educate you along the way, you probably are not as independent as you should be,” Brizzi said.













 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bugatti Owners
    These con artists have the need to own a Bugatti, the world's most expensive car, to flash their "success"--which is how they dupe people. Who else have we read about recently that has a Bugatti?

    Attorney Scott Rothstein's meteoric rise into the stratosphere of local politics, sports and philanthropy is suspected to have been propelled by millions of dollars handed to him by investors blinded by the glitter of a too-good-to-be-true deal.

    Geysers of cash flowed from the flamboyant lawyer, who purchased a veneer of legitimacy through millions of donations to local charities. A hospital is building a lobby dedicated to his family; a Chabad synagogue already bears his name. Millions more went to expensive acquisitions suitable for a Middle East potentate.

    The smooth-talking lawyer sat at the center of an empire that included fancy restaurants, million-dollar homes, flashy cars (two $1.6 million Bugattis among them), sports sponsorships, businesses and a nonprofit foundation.

    At least the State of Florida BARRED Rothstein from serving as a lawyer anymore, and Rothstein has not been criminally convicted of anything yet.
  • Ohio Congressman concerned
    http://boccieri.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=287&Itemid=64
  • Akron Fair Finance office emptied out
    Holy cow.

    http://www.ohio.com/business/74426867.html
  • Carl
    Brizzi said he never voted? Let's see--the IBJ article came out on October 26th, which was a Monday, and 3 business days later on October 30th Durham's Fair Finance submitted an extensive multipage request, prepared by a lawfirm, to Ohio for yet another $250Million. Brizzi has now stated he was on the board a few weeks and quit when Greg Andrews article came out. Board approval would have been expected for such a dramtic request--another $250M for a business that did $28M last year and lost $1.8M.

  • How Long Has the FBI Known?
    It's my understanding some FBI guy who is in NJ now was told about problems involving the Laikin brothers and Tim Durham over 6 years ago.

    Does Welch plan to look into this and ask Robert Mueller why fumblers at the FBI get promotions?
  • Motsinger
    I don't know anything about Motsinger other than he seems too weak to be Sheriff--look at this video where he stands meekly by and says nothing:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb21oEgsJus
  • Re
    I think the bigger question is what poor judgment has befallen a county prosecutor.

    When you decide to become a judge, or a prosecutor, or a mayor, or the governor, you have made a decision to hold yourself to a higher standard. Carl has shown that is not the case. He may or may not have allowed Durham to finance Izzi's on his behalf. He may or may not have traded on non-material information on Brightpoint and Cellstar. He may have done nothing except become boorish and act like an imbecile on the Yacht Party in the Bahamas that immediately preceeded his divorce. But, he is guilty of poor judgment in his relationship with Durham, and choosing to be a member of a board he had no business being on.

    By the way Tim Motsinger quit the campaign for Sheriff tonight. At least someone can show some shame. I certainly hope he didn't do anything stupid except hang out with Durham:

    Message from Tim Motsinger: http://www.timmotsinger.com

    In light of the recent investigations concerning the non-campaign related business affairs of my campaign finance chairman, I have made the decision that it is appropriate to return any and all financial contributions and loans that my campaign has received from him or his affiliated businesses.
  • so what
    IBJ: please show what Carl Brizzi did wrong in your weekly. What if this Fair Finance provided double digit returns? Would Carl get any credit? Probably not. Its my understanding he sat on the board for a few weeks and made no decisions. What am I missing? Durham is scum and we all know it. we could lecture Carl about associating with scumbags, but thats not what this story is about.
    • Indy Bank
      Probably got the money from his the bank he had all the access to his side real estate deals....doubt IBJ would delve into that...little too close for them to want to admit, or print
    • Indy Bank
      Probably got the money from his the bank he had all the access to his side real estate deals....doubt IBJ would delve into that...little too close for them to want to admit, or print
    • Yikes
      Carl, You are known by the company you keep. How to those fleas feel now?
    • Durham salting the Board
      The word is that Fair Finance was peddling uninsured Investment Certificates as CD's to investors promising unbelivable rates of return.
      This scheme is directly out of the "Sir" Allen Standford play book which cost investors in Stanford Company nearly $8 billion.
      Please refer to Russell's report in the Indy Star which specifically states that what Fair Finance and Durham were selling were indeed "certificates of deposit" not uninsured "investment certificates".
      Just how in the hell Ohio regulators let this scam go for so long before calling in the Feds is a complete mystery.
      Perhaps Mr. Brizzi can answer that question. Salting the Board of Directors with a Prosecutor didn't seem to pay off too well in the end did it Tim?
    • jail
      outside of business? Huh? The dude has lost money at every company hes been involved in, either its gone bankrupt or gotten a going concern letter...who knows if he will go to jail but if its true he committed an affinity crime he is total scum....where's he gonna come up with $170 Million? By ripping out the marble he had installed at his Geist mansion? By selling his cars? Maybe maybe he could scrape up $40mil. Let's be generous and double that to $80Mil. He took/"borrowed" over twice that. That's a heck of a lotta money he has to come up with and soon.
    • Fools
      Mr. Durham might be morally inept in his choices outside of business but he has done nothing wrong and neither has Brizzi. And the fool that put on here that Durham will go to jail is a complete idiot. That man (whether he did right or wrong) will never see day one in jail. As some one who has been taken to the cleaners in an investment in the 6 figure range I blame only myself as should the investors in Akron.
      • Brizzi also a fool
        Is Brizzi that dense to believe he could serve a company and its stakeholders well by becoming a director? Or was he just a good-old boy wanting an easy paycheck from his greasy buddy? This stink will remain a long time, Carl.
      • Re
        Where did Brizzi get the money to invest in Izzi's?

        $200,000. Holy smokes. How pathetic, Carl. Return the campaign money so the elderly in Ohio can sleep at night. Show us you have some shame.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. liek the rest of America

      2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

      3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

      4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

      5. whoa!

      ADVERTISEMENT