IBJNews

Carbon Motors' prototype cop car is crammed with technology

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Carbon Motors Corp., the Atlanta startup carmaker that in July chose the east-central Indiana city of Connersville for its permanent headquarters and assembly plant, is still at least two years from producing its first car—a vehicle designed strictly for law enforcement. (See below for a video tour of the car's prototype.)

Key to the project is a $310 million federal loan the company hopes will be approved soon, possibly this summer. Carbon Motors has 13,000 advance orders. Chairman and CEO Bill Santana Li anticipates sourcing 70 percent of the car domestically, mostly from Indiana. Most patrol cars will roll off the assembly line priced from the mid-$40,000 to the low-$60,000 range, similar to conventional police cars. Cars loaded with all options will be significantly more expensive.

The cars will feature technology ranging from thermoplastics to automated license plate readers. About the only thing missing is a doughnut dispenser.

Click here for an annotated view of the car’s features.•


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Really!
    Was it really necessary to perpetuate a doughnut stereotype into an IBJ article? I thought this outlet had more class than that. The merits of this loan and effectiveness of this car are a serious issue to investigate and debate. Also the Crown Victoria P/Iâ??s are going away as a fleet car. Ford has 2 new P/I's coming out. One is a car the other is a small SUV. Neither has the innovations built into it like the Carbon car does, however it is very untested. If I understand them correctly the carbon car will not be available for public resale and will have to be returned or resold to Carbon for credit toward a new car. That would alleviate the look-a-like police car being driven by security companies and police impersonators.
  • Great, just what we need...
    Its amazing there is always ways found to make sure our government can make money off us citizens.
    More souped up police cars to make it easier to hand out tickets for the same laws the officers handing them out break themselves.
    YAY just what our country needs...
  • thats funny popeye
    point one - will anyone be responsible to pay this loan back?
    Point two - why is it bad if another version of crown vic carries passengers? why does that make it a bad police car?
    Point 3 - does the fact that Carbon is in Indiana make them worthy of my tax money? Isnt every company located somewhere? Bernie Madoff is in Leavenworth, do we give kansas tax money for that?

    PLEASE - keep government out of private enterprise.
  • Carbon Motors
    Point #1 - $310 million federal LOAN, not a grant
    Point #2 - Carbon Motors: vehicle designed strictly for law enforcement; Crown Vic: passenger car adapted for law enforcement use
    Point #3 - Carbon Motors: headquartered and manufactured in Connersville; Crown Vic: Ford is headquartered in Michigan and car is manufactured in Talbotville, Ontario

    Carbon Motors - Welcome to Indiana
    • help? or governement funding
      i want jobs created by private enterprise, putting their own capital at risk. Other company's may have gotten help. But this is complete funding by government. That is not the role of government. Who will pay the taxpayers back if this fails? Government needs to get out of the way. We dont need more socialism
    • Let it go
      First off many private entities have started off with government funds or grants. Do your research and you will see that the big three all had help at one time. The tax dollars put into the local economy far outweighs what the Fed is providing. Where were you when Honda got state incentives? It sounds like you want jobs created by the famous "Cut Taxes to stimulate the economy" slogan that has not been effective for 18 years.

      Secondly, Carbon motors is stating the price range is from $40k to $60k well within Fords stated range. Ford and GM have not focused on the law enforcement niche for many years putting out sub par products.
    • why should government fund this
      Norm Heikens continues to shamelessly shill for this company. But why should my tax dollars fund this private company to compete with a free enterprise, non government funded company.? If this is such a good idea, where are the venture capitalists? This is a sinkhole for my tax dollars. It is pitiful that "conservatives" in Indiana are in favor, solely because it is in their district.

      Keep government out of startup businesses!

      Let me repeat; if this is such a good idea, where are the venture capitalists?
    • Your Wrong
      This car by the way costs just as much as the crown vic with everything added onto it! The thing about this car is that mileage is 10 times better, car is designed for police use, crown vic is not its a sedan designed for families in mind! This car will save lives and that is why there is 13,000 on hold!
    • But who can afford it?
      I don't believe for a minute that Carbon Motors has 13,000 advance orders. This is a car that is too expensive, cannot be serviced except by Carbon, and has no operational credibility. The Crown Vic will continue to be the choice for most law enforcement agencies simply because it fulfills 90% of perceived needs; it is relatively inexpensive, less than half what a Carbon will probably cost (and final price for the Carbon car has never been officially announced though it is expected to be in the $60K range). I see smoke and mirrors....

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. As typical, the cart apologists continue to rant. This will last until they realize that this 500 will not be the last, then they will go back into their semi secclusion and cry about the fact they have not been apologized to. How many years have you been predicting the end of the 500? We are getting close to the number of years cart lasted without the 500.

    2. So you folks have proven my point. Viewership is down in NASCAR pretty much across the board. So why is comparing viewership of NBA to Racing even remotely on the same level?

    3. 18.2 LOCAL TV ratings for the Pacers! They rock!

      Does anybody have the local TV ratings numbers for Pole Day and Bump Day? If it's any consideration, NHL got a 0.1 on NBC, the same network that owns the NBC Sports Network that the IRL..err, IZOD INDYCAR SERIES exclusively advertises and broadcasts on these days.

      If NHL got 0.1, and Indy had little attendance and prolly even fewer watching on TV because of no OTA presence...geez, what does that tell ya businesspeople? Yep, Indy is dead as a doornail.

    4. Do you ever tire of being wrong? I guess not as you still support the twice fired Anton. LOL.

      Friday’s NBA playoff doubleheader performed well for ESPN, with Thunder/Lakers Game 3 earning one of the network’s largest early round audiences.

      Game 3 of the Thunder/Lakers second round NBA playoff series drew
      7.377 million viewers on ESPN Friday night, down 4% from Lakers/Mavericks Game 3 last year (7.658M), but up 73% from Suns/Spurs Game 3 in 2010 (4.267M).

      The game stands as the second-most viewed telecast of the postseason (through Friday), behind only Game 2 of the series (7.445M).

      Overall, Game 3 ranks as the third-most viewed first or second round NBA playoff game ever on ESPN — behind only Cavaliers/Celtics Game 6 in 2010 (8.983M) and last year’s aforementioned Lakers/Mavericks Game 3.

      Earlier in the night, Game 4 of the Celtics/Sixers series drew 4.751 million viewers, up 32% from Bulls/Hawks Game 3 last year (3.610M), and up 28% from Cavaliers/Celtics Game 3 in 2010 (3.701M).

      The 32% increase is the second-largest of the playoffs on ESPN/ABC or TNT, behind only a 41% jump for Thunder/Mavericks Game 3 in the first round.



    5. No sympathy here. I worked my way through college 75-79 and no one helped me. These felons do not deserve or should expect taxpayer paid college education. It is a game to reduce the sentence. They did the crime, they can pay the dime if they want a college education. And, what company is going to hire a convicted felon in today's world?

    ADVERTISEMENT