IBJNews

Celadon proposes merger with rival USA Truck

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Celadon Group Inc. has reported buying a 6.3 percent stake in USA Truck Inc. and proposing talks on a possible merger with the like-minded truckload carrier.

No discussions have been held so far with Van Buren, Ark.-based USA Truck, Celadon said Tuesday in a regulatory filing. Indianapolis-based Celadon requested a meeting to discuss an “association” between the two companies including a potential combination, according to the filing.

In trading Tuesday morning, USA Truck climbed 19 percent to $9.77 at 11:27 a.m. in New York after gaining as much as 24 percent, the largest intraday advance since July 2008. Celadon gained 4.5 percent to $9.72.

Acquisitions among transportation companies are more likely after “sharp declines” in equity prices, Jason Seidl, a New York-based analyst with Dahlman Rose & Co., wrote in a note last week. He listed Celadon among companies with “an external growth approach,” along with Knight Transportation Inc. and CH Robinson Worldwide Inc.

Celadon and USA Truck are both so-called truckload carriers, delivering goods for a single customer in each trailer. Celadon has a market value of about $219 million, more than double USA Truck’s $101 million, Bloomberg data shows.

USA Truck was “trading at 55 percent of book,” Celadon Chief Operating Officer Paul Will said by telephone. “That gave us the opportunity to hopefully have a dialogue with management to see if there’s some opportunity between the two companies.”

Celadon paid $4.66 million including commissions for its stake, becoming USA Truck’s seventh-biggest investor, according to Bloomberg data. Celadon posted revenue of $557 million in the fiscal year through June 2011, while USA Truck had sales of $504 million in the same period.

USA Truck specializes in commodities, according to its website. Chief Financial Officer Darron Ming didn’t immediately respond to a voice mail seeking comment.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT