2013 CFO OF THE YEAR: James Anderson

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

HONOREE, Public Companies

Many CFOs can speak to the business value of time spent on the golf course. But James Anderson, CFO for MainSource Financial Group, got a different kind of education than most on the links.

“After working in public accounting, I wanted to get into something I liked,” he said. So he moved out West to work for a golf course management team. “It vastly improved my game.”

anderson-james-15col.jpg (IBJ Photo/Eric Learned)

Age: 42

Family: children Ethan, 13, Marigrace, 12, and Lucas, 10

Hometown: Lexington, Ky.

Education: bachelor’s, Hanover College

Civic involvement: treasurer for Safe Passages shelter for battered and abused women

Hobbies: golfing, hiking, spicy cooking

But looking to raise his kids closer to his own roots, he returned, settling in Batesville. After getting to know the former CEO of MainSource, he joined the company as a corporate controller.

“I didn’t have any banking experience,” Anderson said. “He was looking for a fresh set of eyes—somebody who really didn’t have preconceived notions.” After six years, the banking newcomer impressed enough to be named CFO.

When Anderson arrived, MainSource was growing primarily through acquisitions.

“We had acquired smaller banks throughout Indiana, Ohio and Illinois. When I became CFO, we were trying to integrate a lot of those acquisitions.”

Then came the downturn.

“We were not as prepared as some,” he admits of the impact of the economic downturn. “When the economy tanked, we had our share of loan problems. So we spent a couple of years focusing on trying to clean up before moving forward.”

The stigma of being part of TARP didn’t help.

“At first, if you got TARP, it was a sign of health. The government was making an investment in you because you were going to come out of things,” he explained. “The media got a hold of it and the perception became much more negative.”

Still, Anderson managed to guide MainSource through it.

“We didn’t have to go out and raise other money or take on additional debt,” he said. “We have repaid it all through earnings. We just paid off the remaining piece in August.” And, yes, there was an office celebration.

The process came with some difficult decision-making, including cutting $6 million through reduced head count as well as increased efficiencies, and renegotiating contracts with suppliers.

“We were turning over every rock to see where we could reduce expenses,” Anderson said. “And it paid off.” After hitting a low of $4.78, MainSource stock has recently traded in the $16 range.

He’s happy to be out of the cleanup phase and focusing on growth, expanding to create larger presences in Indianapolis, Cincinnati and Louisville. He’s also committed to holding on to his employees, not just through fun events like summer grill-outs but also through a quarterly internal call to talk with staff about company finances and performance.

“As companies get bigger, employees feel more removed and sometimes communication with upper management suffers,” he said. “But you can’t just be the numbers guy behind the desk.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.