IBJNews

Chances of health reform passage soar

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

By rhetorically flagellating health insurers such as WellPoint Inc., President Obama’s has greatly boosted his chances of success in the eyes of Wall Street. But to make his health reform bill reality, he might need to answer the less-than-reassuring news coming from Massachusetts (again).

Intrade.com is selling a futures contract on whether Obama’s health reform bill will become law by June 30. On Tuesday, March 2, the market rated the chances of that happening at a mere 30 percent. Just one week later, the chances had soared to 60 percent.

“Every year, insurance companies deny more people coverage because they've got pre-existing conditions. Every year, they drop more people's coverage when they get sick right when they need it most. Every year, they raise premiums higher and higher and higher,” Obama said March 8 during a speech in Pennsylvania. “Just last month, Anthem Blue Cross [WellPoint’s subsidiary in California] tried to jack up rates by nearly 40 percent—40 percent. Anybody's paycheck gone up 40 percent?”

The stock prices of Indianapolis-based WellPoint and its health insurance peers have lost a bit a ground over roughly the same time period. Health insurers began opposing the Democratic health bills in October, but it’s not clear how much the legislation would hurt them. The bills include more than $35 billion a year in subsidies to help an additional 30 million Americans buy health insurance.

Insurers have objected, however, that the bills would force them to cover all comers but then offer a relatively weak penalty for those who don’t obey a mandate to buy insurance. The result, insurers fear, would be that healthy people don’t pay for insurance until they’re sick and have large medical bills.

Obama’s combination of a mandate to buy insurance, a requirement of insurers to take all comers, and subsidies for those with modest incomes is modeled closely on reforms passed in Massachusetts in 2006.

The reform has been popular there, sharply reducing the number of uninsured and decreasing the cost of insurance for those buying insurance without the help of their employers, according to a February report from the Pioneer Institute, a Massachusetts think tank. You can read its full report here.

But small businesses got socked with big premium increases in 2010, ranging as high 47 percent, according to the Boston Globe. And Columbia Journalism Review, a trade publication, highlighted a report showing low-income workers and their companies, such as home-health agencies, struggling mightily to buy insurance that’s affordable for them. That article is here.

In addition, the amount spent on health care services in Massachusetts is still 32-percent higher than the national average, and growing faster, according to the Massachusetts Divisions of Health Care Finance and Policy.

Gov. Deval Patrick, concerned about those costs and revelations of exorbitant prices demanded by Partners HealthCare System in Boston, asked the Massachusetts Legislature to give him the authority to control prices by rejecting health care providers’ price increases if they were faster than the overall rate of medical inflation.

WellPoint CEO Angela Braly has defended her company’s recent premium hikes for individual customers—which average 21 percent in Indiana and 25 percent in California—by blaming the ever-rising cost of care provided by doctors and hospitals.

“The increases in premium costs are driven by prices charges by clinicians, hospitals, medical-device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies and other suppliers in health care that are accelerating much faster than general inflation,” Braly told Congress on Feb. 24.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • IBJ and Fox News
    I didn't realize that the IBJ was owned by Fox News, or that Glenn Beck was writing for them.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT