IBJNews

'Clean energy financing districts' face tough sell at Statehouse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Proposed legislation would allow municipalities in Indiana to finance residential and business clean-energy projects, such as solar-panel or geothermal systems.

Concern that neither lenders nor taxpayers would be held responsible for property owners defaulting on payments appears to be a major roadblock, however.

Last month, virtually identical measures—House Bill 1457, sponsored by Rep. Tim Neese, R-Elkhart, and Senate Bill 260, by Sen James Merritt, R-Indianapolis—were filed as a way to help property owners make clean-energy upgrades that otherwise wouldn’t be practical.  

Both measures would allow municipalities to form “clean-energy-improvement financing districts” to foot the bill for clean-energy retrofits. A special tax levy would be placed on the property.

Forms of this legislation have been passed in at least 23 states as a way to make clean-energy and energy-efficiency upgrades affordable by stretching payments over 20 or more years.  In some states only commercial properties are eligible.

Currently, investments such as solar panels, which can cost $30,000 or more, are not practical for homeowners because many don’t live in a house long enough to earn a return on the investment.

In such a district, however, a property owner might be inclined to make a retrofit because the cost would be inherited by a subsequent owner of the house, with the special levy remaining with the property.

While environmental groups have applauded the legislation, it has not been well received in some circles.

Merritt’s SB 260 was gutted in committee, removing its original authorization to allow municipalities to issue bonds to fund improvements. Instead, SB 260 would allow municipalities to solicit private equity, federal grants and loans.

Merritt said lenders have expressed concerns that the municipality would receive a priority claim in the event a property owner defaulted on payments. Concerns were also raised about risks to taxpayers from homeowners who default.

He concedes that he’s not certain whether private-equity investors would be willing to take such a risk to back these projects, but that it’s possible federal money might be available to place into a pool for upgrades.

“I thought at least we could get a start” on this concept, Merritt said.

Supporters of such so-called clean-energy financing districts said they’re disappointed at the reception in the Indiana General Assembly.

The type of non-bond funding contemplated in the revised SB 260 would appear to significantly reduce the size of the potential pool of recipients and could potentially shut out households with more modest incomes, said Jesse Kharbanda, executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council.

But such financing techniques, better known as Property Assessed Clean Energy, or PACE, are facing headwinds on the national level as well.

In mid-2010, the Federal Housing Finance Agency determined that some of these programs raise safety and soundness concerns that must be addressed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks.

FHFA cited “difficult risk management” challenges for lenders, loan servicers and mortgage-securities investors posed by PACE programs that have first liens.

A handful of bills in Congress seek to reverse Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac directives that such liens under PACE programs cannot take priority over a mortgage.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT