IBJNews

Commercial real estate will continue its climb back in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Commercial real estate experts predict the local market will continue its slow but steady recovery from the Great Recession in 2011, with the medical office sector leading the way.

“Medical office and multifamily will remain the gems for those placing debt and equity,” said Amy Burmeister, who leads Summit Realty Group’s investment-services team.

The growth in health care real estate appears to be driven largely by health care reform. Reform is “helping to change the face of health care real estate,” said Keith Konkoli, a senior vice president at Duke Realty, who said the prospect of more people being insured and thus seeking care is leading to greater demand for space.

In an effort to increase revenue, hospital systems are spending capital acquiring physician groups and smaller hospitals and developing electronic medical records, Konkoli said. “Consequently, they are looking for help from developers on real estate projects,” which he said is among the factors that should provide opportunities in the sector in 2011.

The local multi-family housing sector, meanwhile, should see continued strong interest from investors, said George Tikijian, whose firm Tikijian Associates specializes in apartments.

Apartment occupancy rose from 89.3 percent in 2009 to almost 91 percent last year. It’s expected to strengthen further in 2011, to 91.5 percent, according to Tikijian estimates. Better occupancy is leading to rent growth, making stable properties attractive to buyers, Tikijian said.

He noted that the Indianapolis area is attracting more than its share of capital because the perception of the city nationally is that it has relatively good job growth and a fiscally stable government.

Tikijian predicts there will be more lender activity here in the new year but that development will continue to be a challenge because of stricter underwriting and cash requirements. New product will continue to hit the market, however, largely thanks to government-supported tax credit deals.

The outlook for other sectors is mixed, but no one sees the market backsliding.

A modest increase in demand for office real estate is expected throughout much of the year, but demand could grow at a more rapid clip in the second half of the year if job growth returns, said Mary Beth Kohart, a vice president in office services for Cassidy Turley.

Tim Norton, the leader of Summit Realty Group’s office team, also sees demand picking up. He said that as absorption strengthens, landlords will offer fewer concessions. But continued instability in the market caused by troubled assets reverting to lenders means tenants will be savvy shoppers and will carefully evaluate the financial health of landlords before signing new leases or renewals.

Norton predicts the North Meridian and Keystone submarkets, which have significant vacancies, will be the slowest to recover. He said the south submarket will continue its rapid growth, due largely to demand for medical office space on the south side.

In the retail sector, Bill French of Cassidy Turley expects development to return, but in very limited fashion. On the industrial front, Summit Realty’s Andrew Morris said a shortage of available inventory will make it a challenge for new and expanding users to find space, which will put upward pressure on rents. Morris thinks speculative development of industrial space could return late this year or in 2012.

Whatever happens in 2011 will occur against a backdrop of uncertainty thanks to a proposed change in accounting rules, noted John Merrill, the new managing director of the Indianapolis office of CB Richard Ellis.

A new rule proposed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and expected to be completed in 2011 will require tenants to show leases as liabilities on their balance sheets beginning in 2012 or 2013. The rule change could delay decision-making, especially among large corporate users, Merrill said.

Brokers themselves are likely to make some big decisions in 2011, Merrill said, as they jump from one company to another. “There will be an unusually high number of brokers changing companies as they try to position themselves for changing market conditions,” Merrill said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT