Committee to push for safer late-night stores in Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A panel of state labor officials and retail groups says they'll try to have a plan to better protect late-night employees from violent crimes by May.

The Late Night Retail Working Group met Thursday in a three-hour public forum to discuss how to make gas stations, liquor stores and other late-night retail outlets safer for employees. Since 2006, six people have been killed and 27 people have been seriously injured in violent crimes at late-night stores in Indiana.

The group includes representatives from the state's police force; Department of Labor; Association of Beverage Retailers; Grocery and Convenience Store Association; and Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association, as well as safety and operations administrators from convenience-store chains Circle K and Village Pantry. Rep. Ed Delaney, D-Indianapolis, also joined in the conversation.

The group initially formed a five-person advisory committee with state and trade association representatives to create a comprehensive plan for late-night retailers to ensure workers' safety. But family members protested during Thursday's meeting, arguing that the committee wouldn't include their voices. The group then expanded the committee to include Indianapolis resident Theresia Whitfield, a friend of a convenience store shooting victim. The companies will regulate themselves.

State Labor Commissioner Lori Torres said the committee's proposal must be issued in April or May.

This was the first meeting since a contentious closed-door session last month, of which family members of victims of violent crimes say they were shut out. Torres said that meeting was a chance for her department to get organized before giving a detailed public presentation.

"We got a lot of pushback from the media and legislature and the families on that," Torres said. "In that session, what we did talk about was that we needed to get something done, and we talked to the different groups to see what they already had in place."

Late last year, Perry Tole and Tim Rico, two relatives of convenience-store employees who'd been victims of violent crimes, initiated the effort to make stores safer. Rico's mother was killed while working as a cashier at an Indianapolis Village Pantry store. Tole is the brother-in-law of Marcella Burnell, who was shot in the face while working the third shift at a different Village Pantry. Rico reached out to Tole when he heard about Tole's sister-in-law.

Since then, the two have been joined by other family members of employees in pushing for major convenience store companies to adopt stricter safety requirements. They want fewer employees working night shifts by themselves, more bulletproof plastic glass enclosures around cash registers and discreetly installed panic buttons in every store to send instant alerts to police.

Whitfield said the suggestions for self-regulation are a good start, but unless the companies are willing to spend the money on costlier measures such as bulletproof glass and hiring extra workers, it's not enough.

"Employees are not an expendable commodity," Whitfield said.

Torres, who led Thursday's forum, said she's cautiously optimistic that the companies will be able to compromise and enact the best worker-safety plan.

"The industry just has to be ready and embrace it," she said.


  • Dumb - Really Dumb
    When a disgruntled employee enters his workplace and shoots people, no one creates a committee to determine the best way to protect employees at every business, office complex, manufacturing plant, post office, fast food restaurant, grocery store, home improvement store, etc. It is not the governments responsibility to determine how best to protect workers at convenience stores, or 24/7 drive-up restaurants. If the businesses will not protect their employees, why would anyone work at these places? Better yet, why patronize these stores after dark? If every legal citizen had a carry permit, we might see people injured by these thug robbers, but eventually we would not need all that prison space.
  • late night
    What do you think the .gov can do for you? Why do you think it is the .gov responsibility? The store owners should either move there business out of these crack neighbor hoods or spend lots of money renevating and making these places safe to work in. Bullet proof glass and locking the complete store after dark. The store clerk could serve the customers through a bullet proof window with a turn table.. I have seen this set up in many places rougher than indy. Involving the state labor officials will get you nothing and since they really dont care you are just wasting everyones time. Take responsibility for yourself and solve the problem on your own..You can do it.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

    2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

    3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

    4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

    5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.