IBJNews

Daniels names former counsel Massa to high court

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A former newspaper reporter and top legal adviser to Gov. Mitch Daniels has been named to the Indiana Supreme Court.

Mark Massa, 50, was introduced Friday by Daniels, who filled a vacancy created by the retirement of Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard.

The court's newest justice serves as executive director of the Indiana Criminal Justice Institute. He was Daniels' chief counsel from 2006 to 2010, when he resigned for an unsuccessful run for Marion County prosecutor. He also has worked as an assistant U.S. attorney and as a deputy prosecutor in Marion County.

He clerked for Shepard and worked as an aide to then-Gov. Robert Orr in the late 1980s, and had been a newspaper reporter in Evansville.

"He has seen the law from private and public sides. He is one of the finest prosecutors ever to come to the bench in this state," Daniels said of Massa.

Massa called his appointment "a sobering responsibility and an honor."

"It is really beyond words," he said.

Massa was one of three finalists for the vacancy. The others were Indiana Court of Appeals Judge Cale Bradford and Indianapolis attorney Jane Seigel.

Daniels said Massa's history as his official counsel hadn't given him any advantage.

"Obviously, I think very highly of Mark's talents. But in all honesty I think it operated against him. I may have underestimated how highly others thought of him," Daniels said.

He said he selected Massa in part for his belief in "judicial restraint ... and a disinclination to make law from the bench."

Massa said he believes that judges should look to the "plain meaning" of the state and federal constitutions, and only try to interpret the writers' intent when the meaning isn't apparent.

Joel Schumm, a professor at the Indiana University School of Law in Indianapolis who studies the state judiciary, said Massa was expected to be a "top contender" for the court vacancy since a judicial commission began reviewing the applications in January, due to his qualifications and his ties to Daniels and Shepard.

"If Mr. Massa is interested in being chief justice, he will have a strong shot at the position. The same Judicial Nominating Commission, which just named him as a finalist, will select the chief justice. The commission obviously knows and respects him," Schumm said in an e-mail to The Associated Press.

Attorney General Greg Zoeller praised Massa's appointment.

"Mark Massa has excellent credentials that he brings as the new justice. Mark is greatly respected in legal circles and follows in a long tradition of outstanding jurisprudence. I look forward to his continuing service to the state of Indiana," Zoeller said in a statement.

Massa is the second justice Daniels has appointed since taking office in 2004. He named Steven David, a decorated Army officer who once served as chief defense counsel for Guantanamo Bay detainees, to the bench in 2010 following the retirement of Justice Theodore Boehm.

Indiana has not had a female Supreme Court justice since Myra Selby stepped down in 1999 after five years on the bench.

Shepard's retirement was effective Friday after 27 years on the court. Though Massa fills the vacancy, a judicial commission will select the new chief justice from among the Supreme Court's five justices.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • No women since 1999!
    I know these appointments should be based on qualifications but I can not believe in 2012 that there are no women who have the qualifications to be a member of the Indiana State Supreme Court. Ridiculous.
  • AMEN
    The title says it all...corruption will win
  • What a surprise
    What a suprise, the gov paysoff another polictical hack. Massa is just another example of Mitch. I am surprised Mitch did not consider his bud Mitch Robb. The choices the gov makes never cease to amaze me. Massa could not get elected prosecuter, so the gov makes sure that he has a job for life. Great, another 50yr old to run a court that deserves better.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

    2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

    3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

    4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

    5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

    ADVERTISEMENT