IBJNews

Daniels says he didn't seek Purdue office upgrades

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels says he never asked Purdue University to spruce up the president's office before he takes over the university's helm in January.

Daniels issued a statement Tuesday saying he was not consulted about the work to install new carpet, lighting and audio/visual equipment at Hovde Hall in West Lafayette. He said he would have asked that the work not be done had he known about it.

The Journal & Courier reported that Purdue is spending $380,000 on upgrades to the building that has been home to university presidents since 1937.

Daniels says the renovation was part of a longstanding plan to renovate parts of Hovde Hall that hadn't been upgraded in decades.

The building is named for Frederick L. Hovde, who was Purdue's seventh president.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • a fraction of the cost
    Look at it this way. Purdue will pay Mitch a fraction of what Ohio State is paying their president (2mil) and Urban is goign to get paid 4mil so he makes more than their president. In fact Robie is probably going to get paid more than Mitch. Thunder is correct you have to have a regular maintenance program or you have real problems down the road.I'm sure they got a good deal for the work too because they bid everything out!!
  • would suggest
    to Ken, I believe it was more of Mitch's wife that didn't want to live there than him. It is used for public entertaining as well. Some people like everyone and their brother running through their home everyday and others are more private. Mitch didn't ask the state to pay for his other home and upkeep did he?
  • some time
    I worked on upgrades to Westwood back in the 80's so they had more of a commercial kitchen to entertain the people they had to entertain when Beering was president. I'm sure they have done other upgrades and some additions as well but remember this is just where the President lives it is used to do University entertaining as well so its not just because of a new president. I would bet Cordova and her predecessors had alot more done than Mitch will ever have done!!
  • It's good captial policy
    I'm sorry but this is so much a non-story. Any organization with a good capital policy/process should be spending an amount equal to depreciation on capital improvements. Ohterwise you'll find yourself with substandard equipment. I'm sure these projects have been vetted and are appropriate. Just another opportunity for uninformed to try and bash Mitch.
  • Purdue Presidential Mansion
    After the $380,000 office upgrade scandal, it is learned the mansion for the Purdue President is also getting a major upgrade. No word on the cost, but Mitch Daniels told everyone he plans to live in the mansion on campus after becoming Purdue's President. Westwood to undergo updates, maintenance during six-month vacancy http://www.purdueexponent.org/campus/article_0d1d101a-bbd6-5334-9a57-a232582506a8.html
    • Who remembers
      Thats what you said you would say when the information was made public. When will they be telling us about the office not being used because it is not adequate for you and your needs? Remember the Alamo ( Inadequate house on North Meridian St.)? We do. The politics has now moved north.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

    2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

    3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

    4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

    5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

    ADVERTISEMENT