IBJNews

Developers taking serious look at former GM site

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Developers are still trying to determine whether the city's vision for an urban village at the former General Motors plant near downtown Indianapolis would be profitable, said an official with the trust charged with cleaning up and marketing the site.

“I wish we were further along,” said Bruce Rasher, redevelopment manager for the Revitalizing Auto Communities Environmental Response Trust, based in Ypsilanti, Mich. “On the other hand, I’m very encouraged we’ve been able to attract the interest of capable and reputable developers.”

RACER Trust Cleanup Manager Robert Hare visited Indianapolis this week to bring local stakeholders up to date on the environmental assessment of the 101-acre property, which was the site of a metal-stamping factory until June 2011.

Mayor Greg Ballard initially hoped to attract another industrial user that might bring jobs, but this year the emphasis shifted to creating a new, mixed-use neighborhood, as an Urban Land Institute advisory panel recommended last year.

In an interview Wednesday, Rasher said at least six reputable developers, both local and national, have toured the property since 2011. Of those, two are taking a serious look at the feasibility of the Urban Land Institute’s vision. Led by former Mayor William Hudnut, the advisory panel interviewed more than 75 local people about what they wanted to see on the site.

The 82-year-old plant, at 340 S. White River Parkway,  is near Lucas Oil Stadium, Rasher noted, and it has more than a quarter mile of White River frontage.

“It’s just a matter of time before the river really becomes a significant amenity,” Rasher said.

Given those factors, the site is drawing more serious interest from developers than three-quarters of the properties under management by the RACER Trust, Rasher said. The trust was created on March 31, 2011, out of a bankruptcy court settlement with the 14 states where GM closed plants. The trust is marketing 89 properties and has sold 19.

Environmental assessments at the local site and surrounding area will be finished this year, Hare said. The trust already knows that soil contamination is limited to the west end of the site, where a former chemical distribution facility stood. "A good three-quarters of the property is available and ready for redevelopment now," he said.

It will take years to clean up the soil and groundwater in the surrounding neighborhood, Hare said. Those costs will be paid by the trust, which will continue its work long after the property is sold.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Possiblities
    This would be a great place to expand the Indianapolis Zoo or dedicate 20 to 30 percent of the land to nature wildlife since its next the river. This site has been a hazard to Indianapolis site it was opened and it would be amazing to see plants, scrubs and other natural life on it. I understand some of it will need to be developed to cover cost but let's give a little back.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT