IBJNews

Donnelly wants Zody to lead state Democrats

Associated Press
January 30, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

U.S. Sen. Joe Donnelly asked veteran Capitol Hill staffer John Zody this week to run the Indiana Democratic Party, but his appointment hinges on approval of the party's state central committee.

A Democratic official close to Donnelly confirmed Wednesday that the senator was calling members of the committee to seek their support for Zody's appointment. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the selection ahead of Donnelly's public announcement later this week.

The state's top-ranking elected Democrat typically chooses the party chairman, but the committee has final approval.

Zody has worked as former U.S. Rep. Baron Hill's chief of staff and most recently led President Barack Obama's re-election effort in the Midwest. He would replace Dan Parker, who has led the party since 2004.

Parker announced his resignation in late 2011, saying the party needed new leadership, but then rescinded his decision.

Parker said at the time he had thought about stepping down in 2010 but wanted to give Democrats the best chance of winning in 2012 by getting the central committee to endorse former Indiana House Speaker John Gregg in his run for governor and Donnelly for Senate. Gregg lost the 2012 governor's race to Republican Mike Pence, but Donnelly defeated Republican state Treasurer Richard Mourdock to win the seat that had been held by Republican Richard Lugar for more than three decades.

Democrats have seen some big wins and losses under Parker. President Barack Obama in 2008 became the first Democratic presidential candidate to carry Indiana since Lyndon Johnson in 1964. But in 2010, Republican Dan Coats won the U.S. Senate seat by beating then-Rep. Brad Ellsworth after Democrat Evan Bayh decided to retire, and Republicans won two U.S. House seats and control of the state House.

Despite Donnelly's victory, Democrats lost further ground in 2012, when Republicans picked up a supermajority in the Indiana House that allows them to conduct business without any Democrats present.

Carmen Darland, chairwoman for the 3rd District, said she is keeping an open mind about the new leader. "I think we need to consider the input of everyone," she said.

The 18-member state central committee is scheduled to meet March 16 to vote on the next party chairman. Darland said others whose names are mentioned as possible candidates include former state Sen. Vi Simpson, who was Gregg's running mate; former gubernatorial candidate Jim Schellinger, and South Bend activist Mike Schmuhl.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT