Businessman J.B. Carlson is in debt for $5.9 million, and he may have been the last person to see alive a 74-year-old woman
whose $15 million life-insurance policy named him as the beneficiary.
For two years, Carlson has been fighting an insurance company for the right to collect on the policy, taken out in 2006.
He said he’s also prepared to refute allegations by the woman’s daughter—the wife of Conseco Inc. founder
Steve Hilbert—that paint him as an opportunist who duped her mother.
“A lot of what has been said is pure conjecture,” said Carlson, a 36-year-old entrepreneur. “It is total
fantasyland. I’ve got the actual documents that prove otherwise on key points.”
This photo of Suzy Tomlinson and J.B. Carlson was taken at a party at the Blu Martini the evening before her death. Her
family found her dead in her bathtub, fully clothed. (Photo/ Doug Pritchard)
Carlson has been under scrutiny since Sept. 29, 2008, when the family of Germaine “Suzy” Tomlinson found her
dead in her bathtub, fully clothed.
The drowning death, which came after a night of heavy drinking, was ruled accidental, but Tomlinson’s daughter Tomisue
Hilbert remains suspicious.
In a filing in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis, Hilbert alleges that Carlson was the last person to see her mother alive.
She also notes that Tomlinson’s death came as Carlson stared down the deadline on a $1.27 million payment related to
financing on the life-insurance policy’s huge premiums.
Tomisue Hilbert’s allegations are part of a far-reaching claim against insurance giant AIG, whose subsidiary American
General issued the policy. Hilbert alleges American General, its agent Geoffrey Vanderpal, Carlson and the lenders who financed
the policy premiums engaged in a scheme that resulted in “tragedy for Mrs. Tomlinson’s children and grandchildren.”
Hilbert is seeking $45 million in damages from AIG, according to a filing she submitted in federal court in July. But her
attorneys say in filings that the suit is not “just about the money.” The family wants “truthful information
about Mrs. Tomlinson’s death and the complicated events leading up to her demise. They also want to ensure that the
counter-defendants who wagered on their mother’s life do not benefit from her death.”
According to filings by Hilbert’s attorneys, Carlson previously told her that when he left Tomlinson at her home late
Sept. 27 or early Sept. 28, she was alive but highly intoxicated and under the influence of Vicodin.
Hilbert alleges Carlson told her that, when he left, “a ‘black man’ who was angry with her was in her front
yard.”
Carlson, as trustee of the Germaine Tomlinson Insurance Trust, filed an answer Oct. 26 that denies Tomisue Hilbert’s
allegations, including that he told her a “bizarre story” about the night’s events. His personal attorney,
Jeffrey Meunier of Carmel, is preparing to file an additional response to Hilbert’s allegations.
Controversial insurance
Hilbert’s claim for $45 million is the latest twist in a suit that American General initiated in 2008.
At the center of the case is a controversial form of coverage known as stranger-originated life insurance, or STOLI, that
effectively allows outside investors to wager on when an insured person will die.
In a typical transaction, an investor entices someone, usually a senior citizen, to take out a multimillion-dollar life insurance
policy. Investors pay the premiums and purchase the policy, making them the beneficiaries. In return, the insured person receives
an upfront cut of the eventual death payout.
Under the arrangement, the sooner the insured person dies, the better the return for investors.
Such policies were banned in Indiana in 2008. Though American General issued the Tomlinson coverage two years before the
prohibition, the insurer argues the policy is invalid because Carlson and others committed fraud in the application by making
it appear as though it was solely for the benefit of Tomlinson and her family.
Carlson denies fraud and says the policy was a legitimate form of “key man” life insurance coverage for Tomlinson,
who served on the board of his company, Carlson Media Group, from 2002 through 2007.
Carlson’s court filings describe Tomlinson as a “rainmaker” for Carlson Media Group, which was trying to
launch an electronic coupon product called “Qbate.” One of the meetings she arranged was with her son-in-law.
Tomlinson did not have extensive experience as a businesswoman, according to the obituary that appeared in The Indianapolis
Star. It said she was born in France and came to the United States in 1960 after marrying an American soldier.
She ran antique and furniture shops in the 1970s and 1980s, the obituary said. Then in 1994, one of her six children, Tomisue,
married Steve Hilbert, who at the time was Conseco’s CEO.
In 1996, Tomlinson pleaded guilty to felony welfare fraud after investigators charged she took food stamps when she had $86,000
in the bank, Hamilton County court records show. She was sentenced to one year of home detention. In 2007, Tomlinson pleaded
guilty to operating a vehicle while intoxicated and endangering a person in the process. She spent 20 days in jail on that
conviction.
‘Sham’ business?
The counterclaim Tomisue Hilbert filed this summer piggybacks on American General’s earlier filings, which raise questions
about inconsistencies in the policy application. Tomlinson, for example, said she wanted the policy for estate-planning purposes.
The person who prepared her statement of assets, purported to be more than $40 million, was an associate of Carlson’s.
Hilbert goes further, stating that American General turned a “blind eye” to what should have been red flags in
the underwriting process.
Suzy Tomlinson and J.B. Carlson attended the Blu Martini’s fifth-anniversary party the evening before she
died. He might have been the last person to see her alive. (Photo/ Doug Pritchard)
Hilbert’s attorneys also attempt to dig into Carlson and his business. They call Carlson Media Group a “sham”
that hasn’t operated since 2004. They note that his former accountant lived in a motel and committed suicide in June
2008.
After Qbate fizzled, they claim, Carlson set out with his old friend Vanderpal to recruit STOLI participants.
“It’s fiction, largely, or they take facts and twist them into their own narrative,” Carlson told IBJ.
Carlson declined to go into further detail about his business activities over the phone.
Carlson Media Group incorporated in 2001 but has been inactive since March 2008, according to records filed with the Indiana
Secretary of State’s Office.
Carlson lists his business address as 101 W. Ohio St. The directory lists JB Carlson Corp., an entity he created in 1994,
as a 20th-floor tenant. But the space is within the offices of Amerimar Business Centers, which provides meeting sites and
mail services to firms that lack their own offices.
Hilbert’s attorneys also cast suspicion over Carlson’s decision to change his name from Jason C. Bolf in 2007.
According to her attorneys, when he pitched Hilbert on Qbate, he went by Jason Bolf. Several years later, when Tomlinson
brought him to a family event, Carlson “did not acknowledge that he had met Mr. Hilbert earlier when he was Jason Bolf,”
the attorneys allege.
Carlson said he’s frustrated by the Hilberts’ insinuation he had something to hide. He said that in one e-mail
exchange with Steve Hilbert, he signed his name as J.B. Carlson, but added that Hilbert may remember Tomlinson introducing
him as Jason.
“Steve called me J.B. People most of my life have called me J.B. He knew I went by both.”
Carlson said that e-mails and other correspondence with the Hilberts will show he wasn’t concealing anything. Asked
about the reason for his name change, Carlson replied, “Here we go with that again.”
After Qbate failed, Tomisue Hilbert alleges, Vanderpal and Carlson worked together to make a quick buck through the STOLI
policy—an accusation Carlson denies. According to her complaint, Vanderpal and Carlson met in their high school years
at an “entrepreneurship camp” in Wichita, Kan.
Vanderpal, a financial planner, became an investor in CMG, but also owed “substantial” sums to Carlson and CMG
for loans that financed his unsuccessful runs for public office, according to the complaint.
In Vanderpal’s 2006 run for Nevada treasurer, his opponent made hay of the fact that he’d filed for personal
bankruptcy in 2003, listing more than $237,000 in liabilities, according to an article in Las Vegas Review-Journal.
U.S. District Court Judge Sarah Evans Barker ruled Sept. 30 that Hilbert could move forward with her claims against AIG and
the allegations that Vanderpal and Carlson were in cahoots.
“My guess is, we’re going to learn a lot more as we proceed,” Hilbert’s attorney, Linda Pence, said.
The Hilberts were not available for comment.
Case closed
Police said in May that they were taking a second look at the case, based on new evidence, but they haven’t changed
their view that Tomlinson’s death was accidental. Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department spokesman Sgt. Paul Thompson
said the case remains closed.
Carlson’s relationship with Tomlinson was the subject of a front-page article in The Wall Street Journal in
April. The story detailed Tomlinson’s night out on Sept. 27, 2008, with Carlson at an anniversary party for their favorite
bar, Blu Martini. Carlson told the reporter he drove Tomlinson home and left her on her sofa.
According to Hilbert’s court filing, Carlson told her a slightly different story, saying Tomlinson was intoxicated
and under the influence of Vicodin and that an angry man was in her front yard.
While Carlson still hopes to one day collect on the insurance policy, for now he’s in a deep financial hole. As trustee
of the Germaine Tomlinson Insurance Trust, he scrambled to keep lenders from foreclosing on the policy. In October 2008, he,
Vanderpal and another businessman brokered a bridge loan for $1.27 million to keep the policy in effect.
Carlson now owes that amount, plus $4.6 million—money due to the bridge lender that in July 2009 won a default judgment
against him and other entities involved in the transaction.
In his answer to Hilbert’s suit, Carlson notes that he, not Tomlinson’s heirs, worked to keep the policy out
of foreclosure. If they recover any money through their lawsuit, he says, they should have to repay him.•

















liek the rest of America
These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.
It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
whoa!