IBJNews

Duke takes smaller loss despite falling revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Duke Realty Corp. on Wednesday reported a second-quarter loss of $28.5 million, or 11 cents per share, slightly smaller than a loss of $29 million, or 12 cents per share, in the same quarter of 2011.

Funds from operations, or FFO, for the quarter was $69.4 million, or 25 cents per share, compared with $76 million, or 29 cents per share, in the year-ago quarter. FFO is a common measure of performance for real estate investment trusts.

Total revenue declined to $268.6 million in the second quarter from $315.4 million a year ago.

Core FFO for the quarter was $70.4 million, or 26 cents per share, down from $76.4 million, or 29 cents, in the same quarter of 2011. The per-share figure met the expectations of 13 analysts polled by Thomson Reuters.

The company said it narrowed its core FFO guidance for 2012 to a range of 98 cents to $1.06 per share, down from previous guidance of 94 cents to $1.06 per share.

The company declared a quarterly cash dividend of 17 cents per share, or 68 cents per share on an annualized basis, payable Aug. 31.

Duke shares rose 1 cent on Wednesday before the earnings announcement, to $13.99 each.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why should I a home owner pay for this"car sharing" ????

  2. By the way, the right to work law is intended to prevent forced union membership, not as a way to keep workers in bondage as you make it sound, Italiano. If union leadership would spend all of their funding on the workers, who they are supposed to be representing, instead of trying to buy political favor and living lavish lifestyles as a result of the forced membership, this law would never had been necessary.

  3. Unions once served a noble purpose before greed and apathy took over. Now most unions are just as bad or even worse than the ills they sought to correct. I don't believe I have seen a positive comment posted by you. If you don't like the way things are done here, why do you live here? It would seem a more liberal environment like New York or California would suit you better?

  4. just to clear it up... Straight No Chaser is an a capella group that formed at IU. They've toured nationally typically doing a capella arangements of everything from Old Songbook Standards to current hits on the radio.

  5. This surprises you? Mayor Marine pulled the same crap whenhe levered the assets of the water co up by half a billion $$$ then he created his GRAFTER PROGRAM called REBUILDINDY. That program did not do anything for the Ratepayors Water Infrastructure Assets except encumber them and FORCE invitable higher water and sewer rates on Ratepayors to cover debt coverage on the dough he stole FROM THE PUBLIC TRUST. The guy is morally bankrupt to the average taxpayer and Ratepayor.

ADVERTISEMENT