IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Let's abandon immigration bill

 IBJ Staff
March 26, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Lawmakers should take notice when broad swaths of society increasingly register opposition to pending legislation, and the immigration reform bill before the General Assembly is one such example.

A growing coalition of business, educational, government and religious leaders is supporting the Indiana Compact, a guideline for discussing state immigration issues that calls for a federal solution and questions not only the tone of the debate but also the bill that passed the Senate and now is under consideration in the House.

As of last week, the compact had attracted more than 3,600 signatories. What matters more than the number, though, is the cross section of Hoosiers.

Some are household names locally: Greg Zoeller, Terry Curry, Ed Delaney, Bill Hudnut, Roland Dorson, Ellen Annala, Craig Huse, Daniel Buechlein. Others are students, nurses, architects, farmers. Michael Workman, of Kokomo, described his status as unemployed.

As the compact notes, it isn’t difficult to understand the frustration with illegal immigration that motivated the bill. Arizona, California and other states are struggling to fund social services and education for illegal immigrants, and a porous border is no way to keep a nation safe from terrorists. Blue-collar workers, in particular, worry about the competition for jobs.

But the Indiana bill, which asks police officers to ask someone for proof of immigration status if the officer has reasonable suspicion that they are in the country illegally, is a recipe for all kinds of trouble. Police shouldn’t be forced to make the judgment calls, and Latinos and others who are here legally shouldn’t be made to feel harassed.

Other reasons for rejecting the bill also bear repeating.

Business interests oppose the Arizona-style immigration bill for its potential to send an unwelcoming message. The convention trade, a key industry in Indianapolis, would risk the kind of ostracism that prompted Arizona lawmakers to backpedal recently on toughening the state’s already stringent regulations. Large employers have weighed in with similar concerns.

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller has said the bill would be expensive to defend in the face of an all-but-certain federal challenge.

Sen. Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, frets the legislation would harm the state’s image and wouldn’t end illegal immigration, anyway.

And as an example of the opposition from religious groups, the Mennonite Church USA, which is headquartered in Elkhart, says the bill runs counter to the command to love one’s neighbors.

Indiana isn’t the only state considering tightening its illegal immigration statutes. But lawmakers here and elsewhere should put their battles on hold and lean on President Obama and Congress to address the matter comprehensively.

Maybe the best thing that could come from the Democrats’ detour to Illinois would be for this bill to die.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What Part Of Illegal Don't You Understand?
    Sen. Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, frets the legislation would harm the stateâ??s image and wouldnâ??t end illegal immigration, anyway."So let's not go after criminals because there will still be more criminals? WHAT? When are you up for re-election Luke?Maybe we should take a public vote to see if immigration laws should be enforced.We already did sometihing like that last November.Get in touch with your congressman & let them know how you feel,then vote these people out in November who value illegals more than Americans.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT