EDITORIAL: Consider tapping bank fund to ease budget woes

 IBJ Staff
January 1, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

It’s shaping up to be a heck of a fight.

Legislators trying to wrestle to the ground a two-year state budget—with sharply reduced revenue, programs that have been cut to the quick, a supposedly untouchable education allocation, and a host of fresh lawmakers full of their own priorities—will inflict more than a few bumps and bruises.

Something that might apply a little salve to the wounds is withdrawing cash from the dormant public deposit insurance fund, or PDIF. As reported in a front-page story in last week’s IBJ, the $250 million fund has not been tapped in nearly 20 years. This is in spite of the avalanche of bank failures during the recession.

Indiana is the only remaining state with such a fund, which was created in the wake of the Great Depression to safeguard money invested by public entities in the event a bank holding those funds failed and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. didn’t fully cover the losses.

The need for it is questionable now, because new state regulations require banks that hold public funds and have high risk ratings to back up those funds with collateral. The value of that collateral is expected to be $5 billion.

Which makes the need for the PDIF debatable, in spite of bankers’ political posturing to the contrary. With a projected gap of $1 billion between expenses and revenue in the next two years, the state needs to harness all possible resources to prevent cuts from going any deeper than necessary. The governor advocates dipping into the fund, and at least one high-ranking House Democrat thinks it’s worthy of discussion.

It seems reasonable for legislators to consider making a concession to banks, such as a lower income tax, to address their claims that the money belongs to them, since financial institutions paid into the fund for decades.

The solid majority of Republicans in both houses means business-friendly legislation is likely to get more attention than usual this year. Lawmakers should support Hoosier investment by beefing up these tax credits:

• Increase the maximum for venture-capital tax credits to $1 million, suspend the application fee, and simplify the application process.

• Increase the revitalization of unused industrial sites by expanding the use of so-called “dinosaur building” tax credits to include facilities that are smaller, were in use for a shorter time, and have been vacant for a shorter time.

Finally, in spite of the Republican sweep in November, we ask legislators to steer clear of issues such as gay marriage, abortion and immigration. Inserting such polarizing questions into the session only makes it more difficult to achieve compromise and progress on more pressing matters. The budget alone will create enough opportunities to make fur fly.

Let the debating begin.•


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.