EDITORIAL: Run for president, Gov. Daniels

 IBJ Staff
March 6, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

A presidential campaign isn’t an experience one wishes on anybody. Campaigns have grown protracted, grueling and increasingly nasty. If they succeed, the job itself is often thankless.

Despite those considerable downsides, Gov. Mitch Daniels should step through the door he cracked open last month and throw his hat in the ring. He spelled out the reasons himself when he complained to Washington reporters that the current crop of potential Republican candidates is sidestepping some of the biggest threats to the nation’s future, namely the skyrocketing debt, dependence on foreign oil, and the shaken confidence in the economic freedom that helped make the United States great.

Daniels’ record as a reformer and problem-solver, coupled with his tendency toward blunt talk, gives him street cred to force these unpleasant challenges onto front burners. He has faced down the Legislature to preserve a budget surplus during lean times, risked political capital on daylight-saving time and the toll road lease, and transformed license branches from dens of mediocrity into professionally operated offices.

Daniels sounds believable when he insists he has virtually no interest in a presidential bid. Supporters coerced him to run for governor, and now many of those same backers are coaxing him toward a much bigger race.

It’s easier imagining a President Daniels than a candidate Daniels. He isn’t given to the personal acrimony that dominates national politics and he isn’t flashy television material. And God help the handler who tries to manage his quick, sometimes sharp, tongue.

Daniels also would face tough questions about his previous roles with Eli Lilly and Co., IPALCO Enterprises and the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.

Still, if Daniels were to fill no larger function than Ross Perot played in the 1992 and ’96 presidential elections, he would have done the nation a favor. Perot, of course, was the Texas entrepreneur who kept talking about pesky deficits, and the debate ultimately pushed President Bill Clinton to sign a balanced budget. Unfortunately, those balanced budgets are now a fading memory.

A Daniels candidacy would pound drums Americans don’t want to hear. He’d be the party crasher who raises unpleasant realities and recommends bitter medicine.

But Americans might not swallow it.

One of Daniels’ mentors, U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar, encountered a similar problem when he ran for president in 1996 urging a focus on international issues. Clinton appealed to voters’ interest in domestic concerns and won. Years passed before the terrorists Lugar warned about carried through on their threats.

The United States doesn’t have several years to confront the debt. The nation needs straight talk, and action, soon.

Daniels can’t be blamed for rhetorically asking reporters, “Can’t you name 100 reasons that no sane person would do this?”

Yes, easily. But none important enough to keep him out of the race.•


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............