IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: State scores well on United flights

IBJ Staff
September 21, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

San Francisco is the most popular destination without direct-flight availability for travelers from Indianapolis International Airport: About 175 people per day fly to the California city, and that number jumps to 250 if nearby San Jose and Oakland are included.

There was a time when such strong demand would be incentive enough for an airline to offer the service. No more.

A wave of airline mergers and a focus on limiting costs have led to the elimination of dozens of flight options and tamped-down competition for remaining routes—leading to much higher fares and less-convenient travel options. That’s bad for the state’s economy and a shame given the potential of the $1.1-billion investment in a new airport terminal.

Enter the Indiana Economic Development Corp., which worked out a deal with United Airlines to launch a daily direct flight to San Francisco starting in January. The state will guarantee $1.5 million in revenue to United to support the route. It’s the first deal of its kind for Indiana.

While high-powered local tech executive Scott Jones justifiably worries the flight times aren’t ideal for venture capitalists based in California (IBJ, Sept. 16), we applaud the IEDC and its deal-making partners for their efforts.

This is a big way for economic-development boosters to support many local businesses at once—and encourage formation of new ones—affordably. The state will pay United only if the airline’s revenue on the route falls short of $1.5 million.

San Francisco was a wise place to start. The Indianapolis airport has offered direct flights there three times: U.S. Airways in the early 1990s; ATA in the early 2000s; and Northwest and Airtran through seasonal service in 2006 and 2007.

The flight should attract both business travelers and the leisure travelers that dominate at Indianapolis International Airport. (The airport’s top destinations in 2012 tell the story: Orlando, Tampa, Denver, Atlanta and Las Vegas.)

Other business-critical cities such as New York and Washington, D.C., may be a logical next step: Airlines still offer direct flights there but mergers have wiped out much of the fare competition, pushing prices higher.

The state also should consider joining the U.S. Justice Department in its challenge to a merger between U.S. Airways and American Airlines. The track record for such mega airline mergers suggests the deal will be unequivocally bad for competition and for consumers.

After acquiring Airtran in 2010, Southwest has eliminated competing direct flights, raised fares and dropped Airtran’s direct service from Indianapolis to New York’s LaGuardia. Delta’s 2008 purchase of Northwest—the largest carrier at the time in Indianapolis—was a much larger blow, eliminating direct flights to eight markets including Austin, Texas; Hartford, Conn.; Denver; Philadelphia; and San Antonio.

The state has taken an important step to reconnect its largest airport to major financial centers. But the federal government can do much more by preventing the airline industry from consolidating into monopolies.•

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT