IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: State scores well on United flights

IBJ Staff
September 21, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

San Francisco is the most popular destination without direct-flight availability for travelers from Indianapolis International Airport: About 175 people per day fly to the California city, and that number jumps to 250 if nearby San Jose and Oakland are included.

There was a time when such strong demand would be incentive enough for an airline to offer the service. No more.

A wave of airline mergers and a focus on limiting costs have led to the elimination of dozens of flight options and tamped-down competition for remaining routes—leading to much higher fares and less-convenient travel options. That’s bad for the state’s economy and a shame given the potential of the $1.1-billion investment in a new airport terminal.

Enter the Indiana Economic Development Corp., which worked out a deal with United Airlines to launch a daily direct flight to San Francisco starting in January. The state will guarantee $1.5 million in revenue to United to support the route. It’s the first deal of its kind for Indiana.

While high-powered local tech executive Scott Jones justifiably worries the flight times aren’t ideal for venture capitalists based in California (IBJ, Sept. 16), we applaud the IEDC and its deal-making partners for their efforts.

This is a big way for economic-development boosters to support many local businesses at once—and encourage formation of new ones—affordably. The state will pay United only if the airline’s revenue on the route falls short of $1.5 million.

San Francisco was a wise place to start. The Indianapolis airport has offered direct flights there three times: U.S. Airways in the early 1990s; ATA in the early 2000s; and Northwest and Airtran through seasonal service in 2006 and 2007.

The flight should attract both business travelers and the leisure travelers that dominate at Indianapolis International Airport. (The airport’s top destinations in 2012 tell the story: Orlando, Tampa, Denver, Atlanta and Las Vegas.)

Other business-critical cities such as New York and Washington, D.C., may be a logical next step: Airlines still offer direct flights there but mergers have wiped out much of the fare competition, pushing prices higher.

The state also should consider joining the U.S. Justice Department in its challenge to a merger between U.S. Airways and American Airlines. The track record for such mega airline mergers suggests the deal will be unequivocally bad for competition and for consumers.

After acquiring Airtran in 2010, Southwest has eliminated competing direct flights, raised fares and dropped Airtran’s direct service from Indianapolis to New York’s LaGuardia. Delta’s 2008 purchase of Northwest—the largest carrier at the time in Indianapolis—was a much larger blow, eliminating direct flights to eight markets including Austin, Texas; Hartford, Conn.; Denver; Philadelphia; and San Antonio.

The state has taken an important step to reconnect its largest airport to major financial centers. But the federal government can do much more by preventing the airline industry from consolidating into monopolies.•

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT