EDITORIAL: University research funding is on right path

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Indiana’s public universities aren’t garnering enough research funding, and the research they’re conducting isn’t churning out high-paying jobs in quantities everyone would like, but Hoosiers shouldn’t be wringing their hands in despair.

There’s plenty to celebrate in spite of a recent ranking by the National Science Foundation that showed Indiana is in the middle of the pack compared with other states in research spending per capita at public universities.

As IBJ reported last week, the state was 22nd in public university research spending per person in 2008, the most recent year for which comparisons are available. That’s nothing to brag about, but the total of $852 million spent on research in 2008 is almost $400 million more than in 2000.

Funding grew 82 percent in that time, outpacing the national average by about 10 percent. Research spending at Indiana and Purdue universities, where almost all the research takes place, grew to $895 million in 2009.

With all that growth, moving up just four spots in the rankings over a decade ago doesn’t seem like much of an improvement. But Indiana was late to the party in making research a priority. Purdue and Indiana had a lot of catching up to do to come up with the kind of research that can translate into high-paying, private-sector jobs.

Indeed, the state’s wage data isn’t pretty. In 1998, Hoosiers made 92 percent of what the average American earns. In 2008, the number had slipped to 86 percent.

It’s discouraging that pay is headed in the wrong direction, but that shouldn’t be a surprise. Counting on research to create jobs and improve wages is the right strategy, but it’s not a quick fix. It takes years for the payoff, unlike snagging a factory that almost instantly can employ thousands earning a good living wage.

University-based research isn’t the only path to new jobs, but it’s an important tool in the state’s arsenal. Maintaining the state’s steady improvement over the last decade is key.

Things couldn’t be much better on the private-sector front. Indiana ranks No. 4 nationally on research spending per capita provided by industry. Public-sector funding is another matter. Indiana ranked 26th per capita in state support and No. 31 in federal support.

Being fiscally responsible in harsh economic times limits what the state can do, but there should be no wavering in our commitment. To see what our investment in research can return, look no further than Endocyte Inc., the cancer-fighting firm borne of Purdue research that is about to go public with an $86 million stock offering.

Indiana’s improvement in research funding over a decade is worth celebrating. Let’s keep things headed in the right direction.•

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By the way, the right to work law is intended to prevent forced union membership, not as a way to keep workers in bondage as you make it sound, Italiano. If union leadership would spend all of their funding on the workers, who they are supposed to be representing, instead of trying to buy political favor and living lavish lifestyles as a result of the forced membership, this law would never had been necessary.

  2. Unions once served a noble purpose before greed and apathy took over. Now most unions are just as bad or even worse than the ills they sought to correct. I don't believe I have seen a positive comment posted by you. If you don't like the way things are done here, why do you live here? It would seem a more liberal environment like New York or California would suit you better?

  3. just to clear it up... Straight No Chaser is an a capella group that formed at IU. They've toured nationally typically doing a capella arangements of everything from Old Songbook Standards to current hits on the radio.

  4. This surprises you? Mayor Marine pulled the same crap whenhe levered the assets of the water co up by half a billion $$$ then he created his GRAFTER PROGRAM called REBUILDINDY. That program did not do anything for the Ratepayors Water Infrastructure Assets except encumber them and FORCE invitable higher water and sewer rates on Ratepayors to cover debt coverage on the dough he stole FROM THE PUBLIC TRUST. The guy is morally bankrupt to the average taxpayer and Ratepayor.

  5. There is no developer on the planet that isn't aware of what their subcontractors are doing (or not doing). They hire construction superintendents. They have architects and engineers on site to observe construction progress. If your subcontractor wasn't doing their job, you fire them and find someone who will. If people wonder why more condos aren't being built, developers like Kosene & Kosene are the reason. I am glad the residents were on the winning end after a long battle.