IBJNews

Web domain requests include .Cialis, .Walmart

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wal-Mart Stores Inc., and Microsoft Corp. are applying for Web suffixes including .jpmorgan, .walmart, and .microsoft under a program to expand the number of Internet domain names beyond .com.

Other proposals include .cialis from Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly & Co. and .apple from Apple Inc. as well as generic terms such as .book and .love, according to a list published Wednesday by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the not-for-profit Web-management group overseeing the expansion of suffixes.

The list of 1,930 applications, which had been kept secret, provides a first look at potential rivals to .com and the level of company interest in the suffixes. Icann says the program may result in hundreds more extensions to the right of the dot.

“It is our fundamental obligation to increase competition and consumer choice, and to foster innovation, and this program delivers on that,” ICANN chief executive  Rod Beckstrom said at a news conference in London.

ICANN, which operates under a U.S. Commerce Department contract, says the new domain names will give companies and organizations new ways to structure their online operations and market their brands and products to consumers.

Critics including the Association of National Advertisers say many companies that have no interest in domain names face pressure to apply to prevent their branding from falling into the wrong hands. Each application cost $185,000.

Two or more applicants are applying for 230 domain names, according to ICANN. Wal-Mart and Safeway Inc. are competing for the rights to .grocery. Such cases could be resolved by auctions.

ICANN, based in California, started accepting applications in January. The process was interrupted by a technical malfunction that prompted the group to close the online application system for more than five weeks.

Trademark owners and others will be able to file objections to the proposed domain names, and ICANN will begin evaluating applicants next month based on technical and other requirements, according to the group’s website. The first approved domains may be ready early next year.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission in December said a proliferation of suffixes may create new opportunities for online fraud, recommending ICANN introduce the expansion as a pilot program and reduce the number of domains created.

“What ICANN is doing seems to us to have very little competitive benefit and a lot of cost to consumers in terms of easier ways for malefactors to engage in fraud,” FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said in a June 6 Bloomberg Government interview.

There are currently 21 generic top-level domains, led by .com, and 280 country-code domains such as .uk and .us. ICANN has introduced generic suffixes such as .jobs and .mobi in smaller rounds in previous years, with none of them achieving registrations comparable with .com.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Dot Com is the king
    .com will be the king for a least years and being in the space for almost 17 years, there will be a flood of lawsuits for the attorneys will be winning out. Change is good, embrace it and capitalize on it..

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT