Exchanges sprout around the country

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

When the Indiana Health Information Exchange launched in 2004, it was one of nine truly operational exchanges around the country. Today, the Indianapolis-based organization is one of 73, according to the latest national survey by the eHealth Initiative.

That’s a sign of the attention paid to exchanging medical information electronically. But the folks behind the survey say the nation is a long way from the exchanges being commonplace.

One reason is that only 18 of those operational exchanges are breaking even financially. More than one-third say they depend on federal funds, such as stimulus money that poured into the field but will not be ongoing.

“Notwithstanding the recent infusion of federal funds, sustainability continues to be an issue for the initiatives,” noted the eHealth Initiative report accompanying its survey results. The not-for-profit group is based in Washington, D.C.

The Indiana Health Information Exchange is one of four operational exchanges in Indiana. It has a relationship with 62 hospitals and more than 14,000 physicians, some of which are in Illinois.

Health information exchanges need to sign up more doctors and hospitals to use their services, and to document that the exchange does indeed help them save money, according to eHealth Initiative officials.

In this year’s surveys, 30 or more exchanges said their users’ staffs spent less time on filing records and handling lab results. Also, 28 exchanges said their customers were saving money by avoiding redundant tests.

But far fewer could report the kind of changes everyone hopes health information exchange can help accomplish: only 16 exchanges reported fewer medication errors and decreased costs for patients with chronic diseases.

All those totals were up significantly from the previous year’s survey.

“There is definite progress here, but that doesn’t mean we can rest on our laurels,” eHealth Initiative CEO Jennifer Covich Bordenick said in a statement. “More initiatives and providers need to document cost savings.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now