IBJNews

Fair sues Shelbyville bank over sale of Durham Duesenberg

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Fair Finance Co.’s bankruptcy trustee sued Shelbyville’s SCB Bank this week, charging it refuses to turn over hundreds of thousands of dollars it raised by auctioning off one of Tim Durham’s most valuable automobiles, a 1929 Duesenberg.

The spat stems from a $580,000 loan SCB extended to Durham on Oct. 23, 2009—one day before IBJ ran an investigative story questioning whether the Indianapolis businessman had the financial wherewithal to repay tens of millions of dollars that he and his businesses had borrowed from Fair Finance.

A month later, the FBI raided Fair’s Akron, Ohio, headquarters and Durham’s office atop Chase Tower in downtown Indianapolis—part of a probe that led to his indictment in March on felony charges of orchestrating a Ponzi scheme that defrauded investors of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Fair Finance’s trustee, Cleveland attorney Brian Bash, is trying to scrape together money to return to the 5,000 Ohio residents who purchased more than $200 million in unsecured investment certificates from Fair. He’s recovered about $2.3 million so far.

The lawsuit says SCB extended the loan to Durham and to Durham's Diamond Investments, and in return Diamond gave the bank title to the Duesenberg.

“This loan allowed Durham to keep his fraudulent empire on life-support for several more months while the FBI and the public demanded answers on the misappropriated Fair Finance funds,” according to the suit.

The Fair Finance trustee said providing that collateral was improper because Diamond years earlier already had pledged the automobile to Fair to secure millions of dollars it borrowed from the finance business.

Durham last year turned over his collection of classic automobiles to the trustee, who sold them at auction. However, the Duesenberg wasn’t part of that sale because the title was missing.

Bash later learned SCB had the title and, in January, the bank auctioned the Duesenberg for $1.1 million. SCB used proceeds to pay off the $592,043 then owed on the $580,000 loan. SCB pocketed another $197,731 to cover its attorneys’ fees and costs and then applied the remainder—$316,139—to pay down the balance Durham owed the bank under a home equity line of credit.

The trustee alleges Fair is entitled to the $316,139, since the car had not served as collateral on the home equity loan. He also is objecting to the $197,731 the bank is claiming in fees and expenses, calling them “grossly excessive and unreasonable.”

The trustee said in the lawsuit that he opted to sue after his attorneys “made concerted efforts to reach a negotiated resolution to this dispute ... but the bank was unwilling to turn over a single cent of the proceeds from the sale of the Duesenberg.”

SCB—owned by Shelbyville-based Blue River Bancshares—has not yet filed a response to the suit. In a statement issued Wednesday afternoon, Blue River CEO Russell Breeden III said the bank's action to collect on Durham's loans were appropriate and in step with loan documents and the law.

"While the trustee’s conclusions may make for good headlines, they are abusive, unfair and untrue, and the bank categorically rejects them. The bank should not be made a victim twice over—the first time by Diamond and Durham, and again by the trustee’s actions."

Durham and fellow Indianapolis businessman Jim Cochran purchased Fair in 2002. The pair, along with Fair Chief Financial Officer Rick Snow, are facing 12 felony counts. All have denied wrongdoing.

More of IBJ's coverage of Tim Durham and Fair Finance can be found here.

 



ADVERTISEMENT
  • amen
    "While the trustee’s conclusions may make for good headlines, they are abusive, unfair and untrue, and the bank categorically rejects them. The bank should not be made a victim twice over—the first time by Diamond and Durham, and again by the trustee’s actions."

    Finally someone speaking out about the trustee and his methods.

    The saddest part is that I would bet they'll never distribute a penny to Durham's victims, instead keeping millions in fees.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Well, we could blame ABC because they haven't advertised the INDY 500....not during the HUGE TV rating shows like Dancing with the Stars (of which IICS driver Helio Castroneves is a former champion). He never won a CART championship, did he?

    We could blame the new car...because it's ugly and has a V6 that has less horsepower than the pace car. CART (to my knowledge) never had that problem with cars they presented at the speedway years 1979 through 1995.

    We could blame the fencepost, but that would be crass. Or maybe Danica? Or maybe Jean Alesi....or boost increases from constant rules tampering. Maybe we could blame Penske who still is winning everything as usual.

    Maybe we can blame the world for not understanding the the great Indy gods who regularly twist things in such ways that we mere mortals must only accept, but never question.

    So, it does beg the question....who is responsible if the series and Indy continues to flounder? Are the responsibilities so diffuse and complicated that no one really is to blame for it's fall from grace?

    I urge the speedway to sign on for 7 more years of ABC coverage and 7 more years of NBC Sports Network coverage. It been win-win so far....*cough* *cough*

  2. "They're problem was thinking they were bigger than the institution that made their existence possible. That turned out to be a mistake."

    The above quote made by Disciple shows his continued inability to grasp a simple concept: CART is dead. Twice. It provided a brilliant stage for some of the best open wheel racing in all the past century of racing. It's gone DOOD, get over it.

    PLEASE explain, Mr. Disciple of INDYCAR, why you continually hammer home, even on the eve of the 2012 Indy 500, this same point...over and over? Seriously, why does the legacy of CART haunt you so much?

    The same problems that affected the sport for over a century of AOW racing STILL affect it now. Your answers (or lack thereof) belittle the very sport you claim to love. Indy rots in your hands yet you request status quo. You negate salient points with drivel...always.

    Indy is not going to die. But, it is dying...are you willing to accept that? "Indy is a hot mess"....it's true. Yet you want it that way? What is wrong with you?

  3. I just want to make sure I am reading this right - Wellpoint is eliminating 112 employees. Wellpoint is a customer of Repucare. Repucare is creating 82 jobs. I sure hope they are hiring Wellpoint employees. Does not make sense!

  4. Triscuts...love um!

  5. Of course the fair will go on. Don't you big city reporters understand county fairs? Get outside the beltway and see what life is really like!

ADVERTISEMENT