IBJNews

Feds probing Indiana's workplace safety agency

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The federal government's workplace safety agency is investigating its Indiana counterpart—a department that documents indicate is trying to boost its inspections without hiring new staffers.

The Indianapolis Star, which obtained those documents, reported that they show the Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration recently began requiring experienced inspectors to conduct 61 inspections annually and to complete those inspections within an average of 4.1 days.

Some IOSHA employees have told the newspaper they believe the department's new inspection strategy will discourage complex workplace probes and also endanger workers and that the push was prompted by media criticism about the number of inspections Indiana performs.

A regional spokesman for the federal OSHA, Scott Allen, said Thursday that the agency has opened an investigation of IOSHA but declined to comment on the nature of the probe. He said such investigations are a routine part of the agency's oversight of state workplace safety agencies.

Bob Dittmer, a spokesman for the Indiana Department of Labor, which includes IOSHA, said the federal investigation arose from four to six complaints filed with federal regulators. He said the federal investigation will be completed this week, and a report will be issued by the federal agency sometime next week.

"We cannot speculate on the issues or complaints. We have not been provided copies of the complaints," Dittmer said in an emailed statement.

IOSHA's new inspection quotas worry some agency employees, who say the new expectations will lead to artificially inflated inspection numbers and discourage involved investigations.

The Star reported in August that it took IOSHA nearly six months to complete an inspection of a Sensient Flavors plants in Indianapolis where federal health officials found that nearly a third of the flavoring plant's 100 production workers had abnormally restrictive lung function.

That inspection took months because of the complex nature of air sampling and legal wrangling with the company, which tried unsuccessfully to block the inspection in court.

Such months-long investigations could become a thing of the past under IOSHA's new requirements, which are outlined in performance appraisal reports the Indiana Department of Labor uses to evaluate its employees.

That's because the new quotas require inspections to be completed within four days, while it can take days or weeks to get sampling results back from labs.

Agency employees told the Star that will force them to choose between meeting quotas to get raises and keeping workers safe.

The new requirements also encourage inspectors to identify an average of two to three serious, knowing or repeat violations per inspection, according to documents obtained by the Star. Those violations bring the highest fines.

Federal data show that Indiana OSHA conducted 1,332 inspections last year—the fewest since the state received federal approval to operate its own worker safety program in 1986. The number of inspections has fallen dramatically since the late 1980s, when IOSHA performed 5,000 to 8,000 inspections a year.

Indiana's new labor commissioner, Sean Keefer, has promised 2,000 inspections this year, even while the agency steadfastly refuses to boost its staffing.

Although the federal government requires Indiana to have at least 70 inspectors, the state has only about 40, according to the most recent federal review. State officials have argued their staffing levels are adequate and have petitioned OSHA to reduce the 70-inspector benchmark.

The new quotas raise some serious questions in light of the agency's low staffing levels, said Frank Rosenthal, an associate professor of occupational and environmental health sciences at Purdue University.

He said it's not in the best interest of workers or employers if inspectors are rushing to satisfy a quota.

"If more inspections are needed, the answer is not a quota system, but rather to hire more inspectors and give them the resources they need to do their work," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

  2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

  3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

  4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

  5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?

ADVERTISEMENT