IBJNews

Battle for General Growth biggest real estate fight in years

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The battle for General Growth Properties Inc., owner of more than 200 U.S. malls from Boston to Los Angeles, is turning into the biggest real estate fight since the sale of Sam Zell’s Equity Office Properties Trust.

Westfield Group, a Sydney-based property investor with stakes in 55 U.S. retail centers, signed an agreement letting it assess General Growth’s finances, a person familiar with the pact said Wednesday. That may put Westfield in position to vie for the bankrupt company’s assets as part of a contest already embroiling Simon Property Group Inc. and Brookfield Asset Management Inc.

“For many years, the investing community failed to understand the real value of high-quality regional malls,” said Rich Moore, managing director at RBC Capital Markets in Solon, Ohio. “We’ve just gone through the worst recession in our history and these things are largely unscathed.”

Commercial real estate deals in the U.S. dropped to $44 billion last year, down 67 percent from 2008 and the lowest in records going back to 2001, according to New York-based property research company Real Capital Analytics Inc. Globally, retail real estate transactions totaled $50 billion, down 40 percent from a year earlier.

Plunging commercial real estate values (down 41 percent since their 2007 peak) have made landlords reluctant to sell if they don’t have to.

The last time such a high-profile portfolio came to the market was in 2006. Blackstone Group LP beat out Steven Roth’s Vornado Realty Trust to buy Zell’s Equity Office, then the largest U.S. office landlord, for $39 billion.

General Growth and Brookfield unveiled a plan Wednesday that calls for the Toronto-based company to invest $2.63 billion in the mall owner and take a 30-percent stake.

Simon, which bid $10 billion for its biggest rival, called the Brookfield plan a “complex piece of financial engineering that is so highly conditional as to be illusory.”

The target of the fight owns some of the most valuable properties in retail real estate. General Growth, the second-biggest U.S. mall owner, has four of the five U.S. malls with the highest sales per square foot. Simon owns the best performer, according to 2009 estimates by real estate research company Green Street Advisors in Newport Beach, California.

General Growth’s best-performing malls are the Grand Canal Shoppes and Fashion Show in Las Vegas, Ala Moana Center in Honolulu, and Whalers Village in Lahaina on the Hawaiian island of Maui, according to Green Street. All four have annual sales per square foot of $1,100 to $1,200. General Growth’s other malls include Boston’s Faneuil Hall and South Street Seaport in New York City.

General Growth announced plans to split itself into two companies as part of an effort to exit bankruptcy with Brookfield’s investment.

The proposal would give General Growth equity holders total consideration of $15 a share, the company said in a statement. General Growth stockholders would receive one new General Growth share with an initial value of $10, plus one share of a new company, to be called General Growth Opportunities, with an initial value of $5, for each share they own. Unsecured creditors would be repaid in full plus interest.

“This sets the floor in our mind, $15, and you have a sophisticated real estate investor setting that price,” General Growth President Thomas H. Nolan Jr. said Wednesday.

Under the unsolicited offer by Simon, which the Indianapolis-based company made public last week, equity investors would have received about $9 a share and unsecured creditors paid in full for about $7 billion. General Growth said at the time the offer was too low and it would invite other bids.

Non-disclosure agreements signed by both Simon and Westfield will allow them to talk with potential partners, something General Growth had previously barred, according to the person familiar with contents of the documents.

One of those potential partners may be the same company that won Equity Office: Blackstone, the world’s largest private-equity firm. The New York-based company is in talks to join Simon Property’s bid for General Growth, two people with knowledge of the discussions said on Feb. 18.

At a bankruptcy court hearing scheduled for March 3, General Growth plans to ask for more time to work on its own plan for exiting Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

“General Growth will lay out to a judge why its recapitalization plan for maximizing shareholder value is superior to SPG’s $10 billion offer,” Alexander Goldfarb, an analyst with Sandler O’Neill & Partners LP in New York, said.

“What makes this situation so fascinating is that here is a bankrupt company where not only will the creditors likely be made whole, but the equity holders will also see recovery,” Goldfarb said.

General Growth filed the largest real-estate bankruptcy in U.S. history in April after amassing $27 billion in debt making acquisitions. Brookfield owns almost $1 billion in General Growth debt, two people with knowledge of the company’s holdings said last week.

William Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management LP, General Growth’s biggest shareholder, is backing Brookfield’s proposal, which General Growth said yesterday is subject to approval by the bankruptcy court. The company may still receive other offers as part of the bankruptcy process, Nolan said.

General Growth’s shares have rallied past Simon’s buyout offer, signaling investors expected a higher bid. The stock rose 15 cents, or 1.2 percent, to $13.04 per share Thursday in over-the-counter trading. The shares are up 44 percent in the last two weeks.

Howard Davidowitz, chairman of the retail consulting and investment banking company Davidowitz & Associates Inc. in New York, said General Growth’s assets are strong for the category, even though he views enclosed malls as a risky investment.

“General Growth does have some great ones,” Davidowitz said. “There’s no question.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT