IBJNews

Battle for General Growth biggest real estate fight in years

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The battle for General Growth Properties Inc., owner of more than 200 U.S. malls from Boston to Los Angeles, is turning into the biggest real estate fight since the sale of Sam Zell’s Equity Office Properties Trust.

Westfield Group, a Sydney-based property investor with stakes in 55 U.S. retail centers, signed an agreement letting it assess General Growth’s finances, a person familiar with the pact said Wednesday. That may put Westfield in position to vie for the bankrupt company’s assets as part of a contest already embroiling Simon Property Group Inc. and Brookfield Asset Management Inc.

“For many years, the investing community failed to understand the real value of high-quality regional malls,” said Rich Moore, managing director at RBC Capital Markets in Solon, Ohio. “We’ve just gone through the worst recession in our history and these things are largely unscathed.”

Commercial real estate deals in the U.S. dropped to $44 billion last year, down 67 percent from 2008 and the lowest in records going back to 2001, according to New York-based property research company Real Capital Analytics Inc. Globally, retail real estate transactions totaled $50 billion, down 40 percent from a year earlier.

Plunging commercial real estate values (down 41 percent since their 2007 peak) have made landlords reluctant to sell if they don’t have to.

The last time such a high-profile portfolio came to the market was in 2006. Blackstone Group LP beat out Steven Roth’s Vornado Realty Trust to buy Zell’s Equity Office, then the largest U.S. office landlord, for $39 billion.

General Growth and Brookfield unveiled a plan Wednesday that calls for the Toronto-based company to invest $2.63 billion in the mall owner and take a 30-percent stake.

Simon, which bid $10 billion for its biggest rival, called the Brookfield plan a “complex piece of financial engineering that is so highly conditional as to be illusory.”

The target of the fight owns some of the most valuable properties in retail real estate. General Growth, the second-biggest U.S. mall owner, has four of the five U.S. malls with the highest sales per square foot. Simon owns the best performer, according to 2009 estimates by real estate research company Green Street Advisors in Newport Beach, California.

General Growth’s best-performing malls are the Grand Canal Shoppes and Fashion Show in Las Vegas, Ala Moana Center in Honolulu, and Whalers Village in Lahaina on the Hawaiian island of Maui, according to Green Street. All four have annual sales per square foot of $1,100 to $1,200. General Growth’s other malls include Boston’s Faneuil Hall and South Street Seaport in New York City.

General Growth announced plans to split itself into two companies as part of an effort to exit bankruptcy with Brookfield’s investment.

The proposal would give General Growth equity holders total consideration of $15 a share, the company said in a statement. General Growth stockholders would receive one new General Growth share with an initial value of $10, plus one share of a new company, to be called General Growth Opportunities, with an initial value of $5, for each share they own. Unsecured creditors would be repaid in full plus interest.

“This sets the floor in our mind, $15, and you have a sophisticated real estate investor setting that price,” General Growth President Thomas H. Nolan Jr. said Wednesday.

Under the unsolicited offer by Simon, which the Indianapolis-based company made public last week, equity investors would have received about $9 a share and unsecured creditors paid in full for about $7 billion. General Growth said at the time the offer was too low and it would invite other bids.

Non-disclosure agreements signed by both Simon and Westfield will allow them to talk with potential partners, something General Growth had previously barred, according to the person familiar with contents of the documents.

One of those potential partners may be the same company that won Equity Office: Blackstone, the world’s largest private-equity firm. The New York-based company is in talks to join Simon Property’s bid for General Growth, two people with knowledge of the discussions said on Feb. 18.

At a bankruptcy court hearing scheduled for March 3, General Growth plans to ask for more time to work on its own plan for exiting Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

“General Growth will lay out to a judge why its recapitalization plan for maximizing shareholder value is superior to SPG’s $10 billion offer,” Alexander Goldfarb, an analyst with Sandler O’Neill & Partners LP in New York, said.

“What makes this situation so fascinating is that here is a bankrupt company where not only will the creditors likely be made whole, but the equity holders will also see recovery,” Goldfarb said.

General Growth filed the largest real-estate bankruptcy in U.S. history in April after amassing $27 billion in debt making acquisitions. Brookfield owns almost $1 billion in General Growth debt, two people with knowledge of the company’s holdings said last week.

William Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management LP, General Growth’s biggest shareholder, is backing Brookfield’s proposal, which General Growth said yesterday is subject to approval by the bankruptcy court. The company may still receive other offers as part of the bankruptcy process, Nolan said.

General Growth’s shares have rallied past Simon’s buyout offer, signaling investors expected a higher bid. The stock rose 15 cents, or 1.2 percent, to $13.04 per share Thursday in over-the-counter trading. The shares are up 44 percent in the last two weeks.

Howard Davidowitz, chairman of the retail consulting and investment banking company Davidowitz & Associates Inc. in New York, said General Growth’s assets are strong for the category, even though he views enclosed malls as a risky investment.

“General Growth does have some great ones,” Davidowitz said. “There’s no question.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT