IBJNews

First Internet Bancorp reports lower quarterly profit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

First Internet Bancorp, parent of Indianapolis-based First Internet Bank, said on Wednesday that profit fell in the third quarter due to unsold mortgage loans.

The company earned $765,000 for the period ended Sept. 30, or 40 cents per share, compared with $1 million, or 53 cents per share, in the year-ago period.

First Internet attributed the decline in profit to the timing of gains from closed but not-yet-sold mortgages to the secondary market.

Loans held for sale totaled $44.4 million as of Sept. 30, compared with $19.5 million at the same time in 2010.

“We enjoyed a tremendously active third quarter in our mortgage lending and mortgage-origination business,” David Becker, chairman and CEO of First Internet Bancorp, said in a prepared statement. “Our ability to tap into a nationwide audience of borrowers has enabled First Internet to seek out the best lending opportunities from coast to coast without being tied to a particular geography.”

Profit through the first nine months of 2011 also is down. First Internet reported earnings of $2.1 million, or $1.12 per share, compared with $4.3 million, or $2.24 per share, in the first nine months of last year.

The bank, however, reported higher deposits, assets and loan amounts.

Total deposits year-over year through Sept. 30 grew 15 percent, from $404.1 million to $464.1 million.  

Assets also increased 15 percent, to a record $561.3 million, and loans rose 18 percent, to $331 million.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT