IBJNews

Foreign companies drop bids to run Indiana lottery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two foreign companies have dropped out of the bidding to become the first private manager of Indiana's lottery, with one charging the state's process encourages bidders to set expected revenue levels too high.

Camelot Global Services, which runs the national lottery in the United Kingdom, and Tatts Group Ltd., which operates several lottery licenses in Australia, were among four companies that submitted information to Hoosier Lottery officials for background checks in anticipation of submitting private management proposals.

Camelot officials decided last month to not pursue the contract, saying the Indiana process won't allow the operator to maximize returns in a responsible way, company spokeswoman Laura Pearson told The Indianapolis Star for a story Thursday.

Pearson said the proposed agreement "strongly incentivizes all bidders to propose artificially high income targets" and does not adequately protect the state if the winning company fails to achieve those projections.

Hoosier Lottery spokesman Al Larsen said the agency disagreed with Camelot's assessment.

"We are aware of Camelot's decision," Larsen said. "We understand they are unwilling to meet our high expectations and respectfully disagree with their conclusions."

Tatts spokesman Michael Mangos said his firm dropped out because "the final model did not work for us."

Lottery officials have declined to release information about formal proposals from bidders that were due last week.

Gov. Mitch Daniels and state lottery officials are hoping a private firm can boost revenue for the state, which last year received $188 million in lottery proceeds.

Indiana officials announced in July that they would seek a 10-year contract for lottery marketing, sales and distribution services. The state's lottery commission expects to choose a winner by Sept. 26 and sign a contract by Nov. 1.

Pearson said Camelot officials also believed the state's bidding process favored companies already working for the Hoosier Lottery.

The two remaining competitors that submitted to initial background checks currently do business with the lottery. Rhode Island-based Gtech supplies and maintains instant ticket and vending machines, and New York-based Scientific Games provides the lottery's central online system and terminals.

Illinois last year became the first state to agree to a private lottery management contract. New Jersey and Pennsylvania are considering doing so as well.

Northstar Lottery Group, a partnership between Gtech and Scientific Games, beat out Camelot for the Illinois contract, in part because Northstar promised more money for the state.

In its first year, the firm brought in record revenue but fell well short of the $825 million it promised to Illinois officials. The company and the state are in arbitration over the issue.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Demographic
    A few play the lottery for fun and realize the odds. Lotteries have always been "the poor man's tax".
  • Valid points
    I do know this, Indiana seems to run as responsible of a lottery as one could hope. Whether you are a gambling proponent or not it is a pretty balanced approach showing sensitivity to addiction etc.To squeeze more out of the lottery, more than likely will mean leaving behind that balance and putting greed far out in front of the citizens of this state's well being.
  • GTECH from Italy
    I thought GTECH was technically from Italy. Interesting when we need jobs in Indiana and the U.S., we look to outsource jobs out of the state which ultimately feed the Italian economy. I also read that the Hoosier Lottery was on track to deliver $212 million back to the state this year. 12-13% more in an economy that is still on its heels. Pretty good improvement I'd say. Good job Hoosier Lottery!
  • Why Would the State Encourage Gambling?
    Gambling used to be illegal. Then the State saw an "revenue opportunity", and legalized it, but only if it benefitted the state. Next, the economy turns south, and now the State wants privateers to improve on the $188 million yearly income because, somehow, this isn't enough gambling. The only way to improve on these numbers is to encourage more people to gamble or to encourage those who already gamble to gamble even more. Isn't the reason gambling was illegal in the first place because some people can become addicted to gambling, most gamblers are lower income and it diverts money from their families, and overall, the gambler ultimately loses? Why should the State of Indiana encourage this?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

    2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

    3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

    4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

    5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

    ADVERTISEMENT