IBJNews

Foreign companies drop bids to run Indiana lottery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two foreign companies have dropped out of the bidding to become the first private manager of Indiana's lottery, with one charging the state's process encourages bidders to set expected revenue levels too high.

Camelot Global Services, which runs the national lottery in the United Kingdom, and Tatts Group Ltd., which operates several lottery licenses in Australia, were among four companies that submitted information to Hoosier Lottery officials for background checks in anticipation of submitting private management proposals.

Camelot officials decided last month to not pursue the contract, saying the Indiana process won't allow the operator to maximize returns in a responsible way, company spokeswoman Laura Pearson told The Indianapolis Star for a story Thursday.

Pearson said the proposed agreement "strongly incentivizes all bidders to propose artificially high income targets" and does not adequately protect the state if the winning company fails to achieve those projections.

Hoosier Lottery spokesman Al Larsen said the agency disagreed with Camelot's assessment.

"We are aware of Camelot's decision," Larsen said. "We understand they are unwilling to meet our high expectations and respectfully disagree with their conclusions."

Tatts spokesman Michael Mangos said his firm dropped out because "the final model did not work for us."

Lottery officials have declined to release information about formal proposals from bidders that were due last week.

Gov. Mitch Daniels and state lottery officials are hoping a private firm can boost revenue for the state, which last year received $188 million in lottery proceeds.

Indiana officials announced in July that they would seek a 10-year contract for lottery marketing, sales and distribution services. The state's lottery commission expects to choose a winner by Sept. 26 and sign a contract by Nov. 1.

Pearson said Camelot officials also believed the state's bidding process favored companies already working for the Hoosier Lottery.

The two remaining competitors that submitted to initial background checks currently do business with the lottery. Rhode Island-based Gtech supplies and maintains instant ticket and vending machines, and New York-based Scientific Games provides the lottery's central online system and terminals.

Illinois last year became the first state to agree to a private lottery management contract. New Jersey and Pennsylvania are considering doing so as well.

Northstar Lottery Group, a partnership between Gtech and Scientific Games, beat out Camelot for the Illinois contract, in part because Northstar promised more money for the state.

In its first year, the firm brought in record revenue but fell well short of the $825 million it promised to Illinois officials. The company and the state are in arbitration over the issue.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Demographic
    A few play the lottery for fun and realize the odds. Lotteries have always been "the poor man's tax".
  • Valid points
    I do know this, Indiana seems to run as responsible of a lottery as one could hope. Whether you are a gambling proponent or not it is a pretty balanced approach showing sensitivity to addiction etc.To squeeze more out of the lottery, more than likely will mean leaving behind that balance and putting greed far out in front of the citizens of this state's well being.
  • GTECH from Italy
    I thought GTECH was technically from Italy. Interesting when we need jobs in Indiana and the U.S., we look to outsource jobs out of the state which ultimately feed the Italian economy. I also read that the Hoosier Lottery was on track to deliver $212 million back to the state this year. 12-13% more in an economy that is still on its heels. Pretty good improvement I'd say. Good job Hoosier Lottery!
  • Why Would the State Encourage Gambling?
    Gambling used to be illegal. Then the State saw an "revenue opportunity", and legalized it, but only if it benefitted the state. Next, the economy turns south, and now the State wants privateers to improve on the $188 million yearly income because, somehow, this isn't enough gambling. The only way to improve on these numbers is to encourage more people to gamble or to encourage those who already gamble to gamble even more. Isn't the reason gambling was illegal in the first place because some people can become addicted to gambling, most gamblers are lower income and it diverts money from their families, and overall, the gambler ultimately loses? Why should the State of Indiana encourage this?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

    2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

    3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

    4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

    5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

    ADVERTISEMENT