IBJNews

Former Eiteljorg director suing museum for overtime pay

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A former merchandising director of the Eiteljorg Museum of American Indians and Western Art is suing the downtown Indianapolis museum for allegedly failing to pay her for working more than 1,000 hours of overtime.

Judy McElfresh, who lives in Plainfield, filed the lawsuit in Marion Superior Court, claiming the Eiteljorg violated the Fair Labor Standards and Equal Pay acts.

Besides not being compensated for overtime, McElfresh charges in her complaint that the museum paid her less than male employees earned for similar work.

“Judy contends that she was not paid commensurate as other males in director positions,” said her attorney, Mark Waterfill, with the Indianapolis office of Cleveland-based law firm Benesch.

McElfresh is seeking at least $75,000 in damages from a jury.

She claims in her suit that the museum should not have considered her an overtime-exempt employee because she primarily helped customers and stocked shelves at the gift shop.

Instead of being paid for overtime, the Eiteljorg compensated her with “comp” and “flex” time, McElfresh alleges.

The 1,025 hours of overtime McElfresh claims she worked without being paid equates to more than two dozen 40-hour work weeks.

McElfresh is seeking compensation of “time and-one-half” her regular hourly rate. She worked as director of merchandising for four years before being terminated in May of this year.

A spokesman for the museum said it doesn’t comment on personnel issues.

Also named as defendants in the suit are John Vanausdall, president and CEO of the museum; Martha Hill, vice president of programming and visitor experience; and Susan Lewis, vice president of administration and chief financial officer.

McElfresh filed her suit Aug. 15.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT